Central claims: HiIQ-Youtube
Source gap (updated after QE). The manifest holds one file, videoplayback.mp4. Its audio transcript is short (about 1,070 characters) and omits some on-screen captions; the captions and animation were read from video frames in a deep read [read: deep/videoplayback-3c5c77.md]. The author and date are now known: Chris Sykes (forum name EMJunkie), hyiq.org, video posted on or before 2015-01-16 (Video 4 in his forum thread; identified by the Investigator). The written source is in hand as Investigator files in research/files/: Guidelines to Bucking Coils v2.5 and v2.7, the 2011 "Self-Assisted" paper, Cohn 1949, and page 1 of the overunity.com thread. What still cannot be read: (a) any measured input and output power for a partnered-coil device, because none appears in the pages deep-read (the bifilar test is RL charging, the rotor and alternator tests are prose only, the 2011 scope screens leave output power undetermined by an unstated shunt); (b) the Guidelines' other pages at figure level (pp.1-12, 17-20, 25-33 were read from the text layer only); (c) pages 2-350 of the forum thread, the earlier thread overunity.com topic 14974, the attachment "Net Zero Magnetic Field.png", and the inventor's other videos (Video 3, zSadMqEnO7I; Videos 1 and 2 for any on-screen measurements). Later steps must say plainly when a conclusion rests on [memory] alone.
- A primary (input) coil with two "partnered" output coils, joined in series and wound or connected in opposition so that their magnetic field vectors sum to zero, works as a transformer in which the load's Lenz's-law opposing field is cancelled by the pairing. The circuit as drawn: one input coil over one of the two output coils, the pair in series through one load (Guidelines p.38, video frames; the Guidelines' "CW/CCW" box shows a parallel wiring as well). [read]
- With each partnered output coil wound at 3 times the input coil's turns, the voltage is stepped up 1 to 3 in each output coil. [read]
- In this arrangement the current is not stepped down as the voltage is stepped up. [read] 4a. Feed Back and Feed Forward in the partnered output coils can increase the "Seperation of Charge Carriers" (video caption; the Guidelines read induction as charge separation). [read] 4b. Excess output energy can be obtained (video caption: "Excess Output Energy can be obtained!"). No measurement, circuit or data is shown for it in the video. The inventor's own words elsewhere: the 2011 device "is below unity" and "not an Over-Unity Device" (2011 paper pp.1, 4); "Energy can not be created or destroyed" (forum #7); "It took me a long time to see that there was no new form of Energy" (Guidelines p.47); and, of an alternator feedback experiment, "Not Free Energy, but this shows that Feed Back Techniques can excite the Coils" (Guidelines p.48). [read]
- The technique is cheap to try (from about 20 dollars of parts plus simple test equipment) and the author urges viewers to build and share it. [read]
Record attributed to the inventor by others: on the overunity.com thread (page 1, reply #8, 2015-01-16) the critic "MileHigh", a self-described "hostile witness", writes of "your alleged COP 1.7 device" and "your COP 1.7 claim" (COP = coefficient of performance, output power over input power). This is the only performance figure in the record. It is documented in one source so far. The figure 1.7 does not appear in Sykes's own posts on that page; in his reply (#11) he neither confirms, corrects nor disputes it and gives no power data. Its origin (the PDF, the videos, or the earlier thread, topic 14974) is unknown. MileHigh names TK, Itsu, MarkE and Picowatt as the testers whose replication "will be definitive"; no test result by them appears on page 1.