zzz-Unknown · Source catalogue

Every document in the project folder (1), as catalogued by the fact-finder (facts.json). Click a column heading to sort. The documents themselves are not published here.

TypeYearTitleHow readText
article2002 or later (latest citations: Valentini quant-ph/0203049, 2002)The "Subquantum Plenum": A Restoration of Rationality to Physics
Robert Neil Boyd (identified by the Investigator: same text on Boyd's own site; his 2007 RTF copy differs only in one title word; status given there as 'STG-IX 2006, publication pending'). The .doc itself is unsigned and writes as 'we'. [web: research/2026-10-04-wayback-rialian.md]
Summary

An unsigned essay arguing that a fluid of extremely light, very fast 'subquantum' particles (the aether) underlies physics. It starts from Mendeleev's 'Zero Group' of gases lighter than hydrogen (the essay gives 1e-8 of hydrogen's atomic weight and 2.5e6 m/s, dated 1869; the 1904 primary text gives about one millionth of hydrogen at about 2,250 km/s, and Mendeleev says he 'dared not put forward' the 1869 proposal [web: research/files/mendeleeff-1904 text]) and Tesla's high-voltage discharge work as reported by Vassilatos, then uses La Sage and Laplace pressure gravity, light bending as refraction in a Zero Group density gradient round the sun, and Piggot's 1920 silver-ball suspension at 500,000 statvolts. It cites the ether-drift work of Michelson-Morley, Miller, Kehr and Silvertooth as evidence for an aether, then argues superluminal subquantum particles carry quantum information (Bohm's 'active information'), citing Gariaev, PEAR, Bell tests and a claimed 1999 Los Alamos archive paper. Further claims: Dehmelt's trapped electron refutes the uncertainty principle, a Klein-Gordon-type equation with free parameter K allows any mass, and Planck's constant varies. Almost nothing is derived. Support is mostly secondary citation (Vassilatos) or uncited, and the only equation is a three-line wave equation with garbled symbols in the extracted text. The original .doc was not rendered, so the symbols could not be checked against a page image. The 34-item reference list omits several sources named in the text. Further essay claims added after QE [read: p.1]: longitudinal vacuum EM waves allowing superluminal communication (Rochus Boerner quoting Barrett 1990, Evans O(3), Lehnert 1994); the fractional quantum Hall effect as proof that quanta subdivide; Tesla's crust/core/charge/lightning claims (Vassilatos) and 'incoming aether flux waves'; the gravitational 'constant' as an average with fast variations (ref 7); QED virtual photons violating energy conservation; a 1999 tunnelling suggestion; the argument that EM field momentum (P = integral of S/c^2 dV) implies a massive carrier; Cherenkov/shock-wave analogy and Eberhard (1978) for superluminal carriers. Names cited but not otherwise treated: Stubblefield and T. T. Brown (with Tesla), DePalma 1991 (IECEC), Kanjen and Poponin ('media memory'), Crookes 1892 on Tesla. The essay's 500,000 'statvolts' for Piggot: Boyd's 2006 'LaPlacian Gravitation' page gives 'exceeding 400,000 statvolts' for one case and 500,000 for Piggott; the rexresearch copy of Vassilatos says '500,000 electrostatic volts', the likely origin of the CGS-unit wording (Piggott's own article is not read; the original magazine scan was located but not read). The essay says 'Paul trap' and 'three months' for Dehmelt; Dehmelt's Nobel lecture describes a Penning trap and about 10 months, and also shows a barium ion in a Paul trap (Fig. 5) [web: research/files/dehmelt-1989-nobel-lecture.pdf].

Key claims

  • Mendeleev predicted a chemically inert 'Zero Group' of gases lighter than hydrogen (about 1e-8 of hydrogen's atomic weight, kinetic velocity 2.5e6 m/s) that permeate all matter.
  • Tesla found the Zero Group gases with explosive discharges above about 500 kV, and these discharges dissociate electrons into aether particles that stream away in superluminal expanding shells.
  • Properly constructed Tesla transformers conduct aether rather than electrons, with measurable voltage (10,000 V per inch of winding, up to 100,000,000 V) and no measurable current.
  • Gravity is a pressure effect of a background gas of fast infinitesimal particles (La Sage, Laplace), and reproduces relativity's results without curved space-time.
  • Light bending near the sun is refraction in a density gradient of Zero Group gas, not space-time curvature.
  • In July 1920 Piggot suspended half-inch solid silver balls between a charged sphere and a grounded concave plate at 500,000 statvolts, showing gravity can be locally neutralised by fast positive electrostatic discharges.
  • Michelson-Morley records show light-speed variations up to 3000 m/s, and Miller, Kehr and Silvertooth give physical evidence of an aether drift with the aether partly entrained by the Earth.
  • Dehmelt's months-long trapped electron gives position and momentum with certainty at once, so refutes the Heisenberg uncertainty principle; a separate 'proof' (Boyd) says monochromatic photons have no uncertainty.
  • Superluminal, near-massless subquantum particles carry quantum information, so quantum non-locality is a physical particle flow and relativity's speed limit does not bind them.
  • A 1999 Los Alamos archive paper (later removed) and French follow-up experiments found that operators' attention, intention and emotion change an antenna's radiation pattern and diverge the quantum potential.
  • Gariaev's genetic experiments show information-bearing subquantum media transfer genetic sequences from point A to B.
  • The wave equation i dtheta/dr = (d'Alembertian) theta, with solution exp(-iKr), reduces to Klein-Gordon for K = m0^2 and allows an infinite range of particle masses for other K.
  • Planck's constant is not constant under all circumstances (cited to Webb, PRL 87, 091301).
  • Longitudinal electromagnetic waves exist in the vacuum, potentials are physically real, and such waves allow instantaneous (superluminal) communication that would destroy relativity (Boerner, citing Barrett, Evans, Lehnert).
  • The fractional quantum Hall effect proved experimentally that quanta can be subdivided, perhaps infinitely (ref 17).
  • The Earth's crust resists the aether flux so electrons form there, explaining the molten core, the planet's net negative charge and a correlation with lightning rates; Tesla found 'incoming aether flux waves' with unfailing regularity (ref 1, Vassilatos).
  • The gravitational 'constant' is an average with fast transient and periodic variations, testable by correlating light speed with gravity (ref 7).
  • QED virtual-photon exchange violates energy conservation, so QED is on shaky ground.
  • A tunnelling electron dissolves into subquantum carriers and reforms on the far side of the barrier (suggested 1999).
  • Electromagnetic waves carry momentum, so a massive medium (a particle with mass) must convey it.

Relevance: The only document in the folder; it is the whole project. It collects the aether, Tesla, longitudinal-wave, vector-potential and consciousness themes found in other projects in this review, and it makes testable claims (Piggot levitation, light-speed variation with gravity, antenna pattern and operator state, Dehmelt) with no data in the text.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with the special-relativity speed limit, general-relativity light bending and the null Michelson-Morley result, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (Dehmelt trap argument), the constancy of Planck's constant, and with Bell-test and no-signalling results. The Dehmelt step equates the momentum of a fixed electron with its rest mass, which conflicts with standard definitions. Mendeleev did propose a zero-group ether gas in 1904 (about 1e-6 of hydrogen, about 2,250 km/s; the essay's 1869 figures are misquoted), but standard accounts treat the noble gases as group 0 and reject a gas lighter than hydrogen as an ether. Massless fields carrying momentum (p = E/c) is standard physics, which answers the essay's momentum argument. FQHE shows fractional charge of collective quasiparticles, not divisible energy quanta. Longitudinal vacuum EM waves conflict with Maxwell theory and special relativity. Variation in measured G is a live experimental debate [memory, medium], not evidence for the essay's mechanism. Consciousness effects on antennas and the quantum potential have no mainstream support.

digest + deep read (whole document, extracted as one page, ~64,000 characters)yes