zzz-Unknown · Source catalogue
Every document in the project folder (1), as catalogued by the fact-finder (facts.json). Click a column heading to sort. The documents themselves are not published here.
| Type | Year | Title | How read | Text |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| article | 2002 or later (latest citations: Valentini quant-ph/0203049, 2002) | The "Subquantum Plenum": A Restoration of Rationality to Physics Robert Neil Boyd (identified by the Investigator: same text on Boyd's own site; his 2007 RTF copy differs only in one title word; status given there as 'STG-IX 2006, publication pending'). The .doc itself is unsigned and writes as 'we'. [web: research/2026-10-04-wayback-rialian.md] SummaryAn unsigned essay arguing that a fluid of extremely light, very fast 'subquantum' particles (the aether) underlies physics. It starts from Mendeleev's 'Zero Group' of gases lighter than hydrogen (the essay gives 1e-8 of hydrogen's atomic weight and 2.5e6 m/s, dated 1869; the 1904 primary text gives about one millionth of hydrogen at about 2,250 km/s, and Mendeleev says he 'dared not put forward' the 1869 proposal [web: research/files/mendeleeff-1904 text]) and Tesla's high-voltage discharge work as reported by Vassilatos, then uses La Sage and Laplace pressure gravity, light bending as refraction in a Zero Group density gradient round the sun, and Piggot's 1920 silver-ball suspension at 500,000 statvolts. It cites the ether-drift work of Michelson-Morley, Miller, Kehr and Silvertooth as evidence for an aether, then argues superluminal subquantum particles carry quantum information (Bohm's 'active information'), citing Gariaev, PEAR, Bell tests and a claimed 1999 Los Alamos archive paper. Further claims: Dehmelt's trapped electron refutes the uncertainty principle, a Klein-Gordon-type equation with free parameter K allows any mass, and Planck's constant varies. Almost nothing is derived. Support is mostly secondary citation (Vassilatos) or uncited, and the only equation is a three-line wave equation with garbled symbols in the extracted text. The original .doc was not rendered, so the symbols could not be checked against a page image. The 34-item reference list omits several sources named in the text. Further essay claims added after QE [read: p.1]: longitudinal vacuum EM waves allowing superluminal communication (Rochus Boerner quoting Barrett 1990, Evans O(3), Lehnert 1994); the fractional quantum Hall effect as proof that quanta subdivide; Tesla's crust/core/charge/lightning claims (Vassilatos) and 'incoming aether flux waves'; the gravitational 'constant' as an average with fast variations (ref 7); QED virtual photons violating energy conservation; a 1999 tunnelling suggestion; the argument that EM field momentum (P = integral of S/c^2 dV) implies a massive carrier; Cherenkov/shock-wave analogy and Eberhard (1978) for superluminal carriers. Names cited but not otherwise treated: Stubblefield and T. T. Brown (with Tesla), DePalma 1991 (IECEC), Kanjen and Poponin ('media memory'), Crookes 1892 on Tesla. The essay's 500,000 'statvolts' for Piggot: Boyd's 2006 'LaPlacian Gravitation' page gives 'exceeding 400,000 statvolts' for one case and 500,000 for Piggott; the rexresearch copy of Vassilatos says '500,000 electrostatic volts', the likely origin of the CGS-unit wording (Piggott's own article is not read; the original magazine scan was located but not read). The essay says 'Paul trap' and 'three months' for Dehmelt; Dehmelt's Nobel lecture describes a Penning trap and about 10 months, and also shows a barium ion in a Paul trap (Fig. 5) [web: research/files/dehmelt-1989-nobel-lecture.pdf]. Key claims
Relevance: The only document in the folder; it is the whole project. It collects the aether, Tesla, longitudinal-wave, vector-potential and consciousness themes found in other projects in this review, and it makes testable claims (Piggot levitation, light-speed variation with gravity, antenna pattern and operator state, Dehmelt) with no data in the text. Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with the special-relativity speed limit, general-relativity light bending and the null Michelson-Morley result, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (Dehmelt trap argument), the constancy of Planck's constant, and with Bell-test and no-signalling results. The Dehmelt step equates the momentum of a fixed electron with its rest mass, which conflicts with standard definitions. Mendeleev did propose a zero-group ether gas in 1904 (about 1e-6 of hydrogen, about 2,250 km/s; the essay's 1869 figures are misquoted), but standard accounts treat the noble gases as group 0 and reject a gas lighter than hydrogen as an ether. Massless fields carrying momentum (p = E/c) is standard physics, which answers the essay's momentum argument. FQHE shows fractional charge of collective quasiparticles, not divisible energy quanta. Longitudinal vacuum EM waves conflict with Maxwell theory and special relativity. Variation in measured G is a live experimental debate [memory, medium], not evidence for the essay's mechanism. Consciousness effects on antennas and the quantum potential have no mainstream support. | digest + deep read (whole document, extracted as one page, ~64,000 characters) | yes |