2026-10-04 Google Search (Chrome): queries whose results are not covered by a separate site note
1. The 1999 "Los Alamos Archive" antenna / operator-consciousness paper (claim 6)
arXiv 1999 antenna radiation pattern operator attention intention emotion "quantum potential" symplectic -> no matching paper. Hits are Boyd & Klein's own later papers ("The Inner Workings of Reality", academia.edu; "Consciousness-based subquantum information storage...", ResearchGate; "New Foundations in the Sciences", viXra 2019), which repeat the claim. Also Hiley, "Quantum mechanics: Harbinger of a non-commutative..." (not about antennas).
"radiation pattern" antenna operator "intention" consciousness experiment arXiv withdrawn 1999 "quantum potential" Boyd -> Google: "did not match any documents".
Result: negative. Boyd's own 2002 page repeats the claim without a citation (wayback note). Absence-of-evidence analysis is in sites.md (Leads, priority 4).
2. Publication of the essay at the 9th Space, Time and Gravitation conference (St Petersburg, Aug 2006)
Boyd "Subquantum Plenum" "Space, Time and Gravitation" St. Petersburg 2006 proceedings -> no results (page returned no result text). Status: negative for this query; try the conference's own site and the proceedings volume next run.
3. Boyd's claimed plasma paper (CV)
"Boyd" "E X B drift" OR "ExB drift" "confine and heat a thermonuclear plasma indefinitely" -> only Boyd's own rnboyd page. No independent record of the paper found with this query.
4. Essay ref 26 (cited for PEAR)
"Inertial mass and the quantum vacuum fields" Annalen der Physik 10 393 -> B. Haisch, A. Rueda, Y. Dobyns, "Inertial mass and the quantum vacuum fields", Annalen der Physik 10(5), 393-414 (May 2001), arXiv gr-qc/0009036 [web: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0009036 ; https://www.scienceopen.com (vol 10, issue 5, pp 393-414)]. The essay's ref 26 is this zero-point-field inertia paper (Dobyns was a PEAR staff scientist: [memory, medium]), printed together with a PEAR web URL. It is not a PEAR consciousness-experiment paper. Bears on the essay's citation of PEAR for Bell-inequality violations (claim 6) and on the zero-point-field view of inertia (claim 2, related work).
5. Essay ref 30 (cited for "Planck's constant is not a constant")
Webb "Phys. Rev. Lett." 87 091301 -> J. K. Webb et al., "Further Evidence for Cosmological Evolution of the Fine Structure Constant", Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 091301 (published 9 Aug 2001) [web: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.091301 ; arXiv id astro-ph/0012539 is from memory, medium confidence]. Physics Today (Oct 2001): "A result so potentially important cries out for confirmation - or refutation." The cited paper is about quasar absorption-line evidence for a change in the fine-structure constant alpha = e^2/(4 pi eps0 hbar c), not a direct measurement of Planck's constant. Bears on claim 7.
6. Electrical Experimenter, July 1920 (Piggott primary source)