S. Pouryazdan and B. Vakili, "Relativistic transformation of temperature revisited", arXiv:2606.00521 (submitted 30 May 2026); Phys. Lett. A 590 (2026) 131860, DOI 10.1016/j.physleta.2026.131860. [web] https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00521
- Abstract (paraphrase): the transformation "has long remained controversial", with the Planck-Einstein, Ott-Eddington-Moller and Landsberg laws in conflict. Defining an effective temperature from the transformed energy density of an isotropic system, they find for a photon gas, a relativistic ideal gas and an electron gas that it "consistently increases with velocity", which they say supports the Ott-Eddington view and depends on the equation of state; they conclude temperature is observer-dependent and relate it to the inverse-temperature four-vector beta.
- Downloaded: research/files/arXiv-2606.00521-Pouryazdan-Vakili-2026-temperature.pdf (8 pages). It cites Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology (Oxford, 1934) as ref. [1] and discusses the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation (T sqrt(g00) = const) [read: text layer].
- Note the name "Ott-Eddington-Moller": the paper credits Eddington and Moller as well as Ott with the T0*gamma form; the project's facts.json names only Ott and Arzelies.
J. A. Heras and M. G. Osorno, "A note on the relativistic temperature", arXiv:2204.12572 (26 April 2022), physics.class-ph. [web] https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12572
- Downloaded: research/files/arXiv-2204.12572-Heras-2022-relativistic-temperature.pdf (16 pages).
- Introduction [read: p.1]: the debate is "documented in several review papers" (their refs 1-10). Three positions: Planck-Einstein T' = T/gamma (the moving body looks colder; Tolman's (201)), "supported by many authors" (refs 14-23); Ott-Arzelies T' = gamma T (refs 25-32); Landsberg T' = T, from 1966 (refs 37-42). They write all three as T' = gamma^alpha T.
- Their claim: neither the Planck-Einstein nor the Ott-Arzelies law satisfies the group "closure" property (two successive boosts should equal one boost with the relativistically added velocity); they propose direction-dependent transformations that do.
- Their reference list (refs 1-42) is a ready bibliography of the whole debate, including the supporters of Tolman's form.
Bearing on the claims
Claim 4 (priority 3, related work): Tolman's T = T0 sqrt(1-u²/c²) is the Planck-Einstein form. Both papers confirm it is still one of three live positions in 2022-2026, and the newest (2026) argues for the opposite (Ott) trend. None reports a laboratory measurement; both are theoretical. Reviewers should note that no experiment is cited in either paper's abstract or introduction.
The 2026 paper's link to the Tolman-Ehrenfest relation (temperature in a gravitational field) ties claim 4 to Tolman's later 1930 work; useful context for the primer.