RankingsPrimerArbiterPhysicistMathematicianContrarianQESites logClaimsSourcesResearch notes

Google web search and sites reached from it, 2026-10-09 (Investigator, Step I, run 1)

Site: https://www.google.com (Chrome). This note covers queries whose hits were read as snippets or on small pages not given their own note: DTIC, rexresearch.com, longdom.org (Cornille), IET Digital Library, ScienceDirect, cheniere.org, Google Patents (Buhler), Slideshare (Naudin's later tests).

Queries and what they gave

  1. Cornille Naudin patent "electrical power source" WO - Google Patents US20050057116A1; ZPEnergy notice of WO 02/075912 A1 (see zpenergy note); Scribd/Energetic Forum discussions ("Missing Fundamental Generator").
  2. Talley "PL-TR-91-3009" OR "AFAL-TR-88-031" Biefeld-Brown - citations only (SCIRP, arXiv Antano 2010, Millis 2005 NTRS, Tajmar 2004, Academia). No copy of either Talley report found.
  3. site:apps.dtic.mil "Twenty First Century Propulsion Concept" - only ARL-TR-3005 (ADA416740, already in the folder), which cites Talley as "Veritay Technology, Inc. NY; report prepared for the Phillips Laboratory". Talley's reports are not in DTIC's public PDF set under that title. Result for DTIC: negative for Talley.
  4. Gravitec Serrano asymmetrical capacitor "high vacuum" NSSTC - Naudin's ascvacuum page (already in folder); alt-think (only1egg.com) quoting "These tests have been performed in the NASA NSSTC LEEIF vacuum chamber"; Scribd "Field Effect Propulsion" document claiming Stein "has proved ... that the ionic wind effect can not explain the phenomena in high vacuum".
  5. Stein "Electrokinetic Propulsion: The Ionic Wind Argument" Purdue pdf - cited by ARL-TR-3005, MDPI (Cabanas 2022, gives an accessed-2022 PDF URL, not opened), dokumen.pub (Electrogravitics II); Reddit thread "Scientific Purdue Paper Scrubbed from the Internet". Not obtained this run (lead).
  6. Naudin "plasma electrolysis" Mizuno replication excess heat steam "water droplets" OR entrainment - LENR-CANR Kowalski et al. and Mizuno 2004 (see lenr-canr note); Biberian, "Pressurized Plasma Electrolysis Experiments", J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. (snippet: "One of the key issues is the risk of water droplets that are splashed"; not opened, lead); Kowalski's Montclair page on Mizuno (298mizuno).
  7. Dstl lifter "asymmetric capacitor" report FOI OR "unconventional science" Jones 2005 - only the Dstl slides already in the folder (hosted by Naudin; Google dates them 2001). No separate Dstl Lifter report found. Negative.
  8. "Jean-Louis Naudin" JLN Labs 2018 OR 2019 OR 2020 OR 2021 OR 2022 OR 2023 - later Naudin work (priority 1, not in the folder): "BiTT JLN Labs_Report Independent Third Party Test FRANCE" (Slideshare; Naudin's replication/test of Thane Heins's Bi-Toroid Transformer, Potential Difference Inc.); "ReGenX (Regenerative Acceleration Generator) replication" (Slideshare: "Tests conducted by Jean-Louis Naudin demonstrated that the RAE occurs under load, with increased RPM and reduced power input as coils are added"); "Lifter theory Force/Power optimization" (ResearchGate, Naudin 2002); GFS UAV Coanda saucer (cited by a 2020 WASET CFD paper); Avramenko free-electron pump. Not opened (leads).
  9. "Motionless Electromagnetic Generator" Naudin replication COP independent test OR closed loop - Anastasovski et al. (Alpha Foundation), "Explanation of the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator with O(3) Electrodynamics", Found. Phys. Lett. 2001 (ResearchGate/Academia; supporting theory by others, priority 2/3); ZPEnergy 2021 retrospective (see zpenergy note); rexresearch copy of Bearden's book chapter.
  10. Frolov "Faraday Lab" atomic hydrogen generator Moller MAHG test - Naudin's mahg1 page; arizonaenergy.org page calling it "the first known replication and collaboration of the work done by Nicholas Moller in conjunction with Alexander V. Frolov of Faraday Lab Ltd. of St. Petersburg"; New Energy Technologies magazine no. 3 (2005) with an "FMAHG (Frolov/Moller's Atomic Hydrogen Generator)" article (Scribd); Free Energy Info issue 15 with Moller's "Irving Langmuir and the Atomic Hydrogen". Not opened (leads, priority 2).
  11. "asymmetric capacitor" OR "asymmetrical capacitor" thrust "vacuum" Buehler OR Serrano OR Gravitec patent measured force
    • see below.
  12. US11511891B2 Buhler Exodus Propulsion "asymmetrical electrostatic pressure" - see below.
  13. "Advanced Electromagnetic Systems" Cornille société OR SIREN OR "S.A." Saint-Rémy - see pappers note.
  14. Patrick Cornille STAIF-2000 "Advanced Electromagnetic Systems" paper - see below.
  15. Steorn Orbo liquidation 2016 jury report Naudin replication - see zpenergy note.
  16. site:jlnlabs.online.fr MEG OR site:jnaudin.free.fr MEG "COP" - no results.
  17. Naudin "MEG v3" OR "MEG v2.2" OR "COP 7.3" motionless generator - Bishop's critique at rexresearch (below); Linas Vepstas mirror of Naudin's MEG pages (linas.org; the mirror paths tried by script returned 404); tigre450.chez.com (French, 2003) summarising MEG v3.2 with a 9 W lamp.

Vacuum-force work by others (claim 1)

  • Tajmar and Schreiber, "Put strong limits on all proposed theories so far assessing electrostatic propulsion: Does a charged high-voltage capacitor produce thrust?", J. Electrostatics (2020) [web] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304388620300619 . Abstract: balance resolving +/-0.3 mg, capacitors up to 10 kV, symmetric and asymmetric, with dielectric and no ionisation: "No force was detected for a variety of configurations ruling out most theories by many orders of magnitude." (In air at 10 kV, below corona, as the abstract frames it; check the paper for pressure.)
  • Porcelli and dos Santos Filho, "Characterisation of anomalous forces on asymmetric high-voltage capacitors", IET Science, Measurement & Technology 10(4) (2016) [web] https://digital-library.theiet.org/doi/full/10.1049/iet-smt.2015.0250 . Abstract: measured "real variations of the device inertia"; an empirical formula based on the Clausius-Mossotti relation fits the data, "suggesting that the anomalous force can be related directly to the electric dipoles inside the capacitor dielectric", force always toward the small electrode. Supporting work by others (priority 2), a dielectric-capacitor experiment rather than a Lifter. Its reference list cites Quantum Potential Corporation, "Is ablation responsible for asymmetric capacitor thrust in vacuum?" (NASA SBIR solicitation report, 2011) - lead.
  • US 11,511,891 B2, "System and method for generating forces using asymmetrical electrostatic pressure" (also WO 2020/159603 A2), inventor list including Charles Raymond Buhler IV; Buhler founded Exodus Propulsion Technologies [web] https://patents.google.com/patent/US11511891B2/en (snippets; page not readable in Chrome this run). Snippet: "The-axis oriented asymmetrical electrostatic pressure force on each electrode vector sums to a net resulting electrostatic pressure force on the object." Google snippets also show the patent's background discussing "measurement of a force while in a vacuum chamber. Talley ultimately ...". An Air University journal (Air and Space Operations Review) cites the patent. Buhler's 2023-2025 talks (Tim Ventura, Alt Propulsion YouTube) claim about 2,000 vacuum-chamber runs showing a propellantless force (Reddit snippet). Related work (priority 3) that revives the asymmetric-capacitor-in-vacuum claim with a different stated mechanism; Buhler has a commercial stake.
  • Buhler D.R., "Exploratory research on the phenomenon of the movement of high voltage capacitors" (J. Space Mixing, 2004, ResearchGate 228989183) - cited by Tajmar 2020; reports force values in vacuum (snippet). Lead.

Cornille's own later account (claim 1 and claim 6; co-inventor's work, priority 1)

Patrick Cornille, "A Review on Electromagnetic Propulsion by Stimulated Forces", J. Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering 9(2) (2020), Longdom (also HAL hal-05654905) [web] https://www.longdom.org/open-access/a-review-on-electromagnetic-propulsion-by-stimulated-forces-53822.html (HTML saved in research/pages/longdom_cornille.htm; the HAL PDF refused scripted download). Points, in Cornille's terms: - The common explanation he proposes: "the motion results from the violation of the Newton's third law due the magnetic force if we assume that the capacitor has an absolute motion defined with respect to vacuum" ("stimulated forces"). - He sets ion and plasma propulsion apart: the exhaust "is quasi neutral in both cases", so it "has nothing to do with the pendulum or the lifter experiments discussed in this paper". - "Naudin JL worked on the concept of stimulated force applied to scientific projects among them electromagnetic propulsion which is referenced in the literature as the lifter project." - A section "Cornille-Naudin experimental work": a Trouton-Noble-type test near Paris, "repeated dozens of time ... over a three-year period": a 500 pF Plexiglas-dielectric plate capacitor (aluminium foils 190 x 150 mm) hung on a 1.5 m nylon thread; first results 1996-97 with a Wimshurst machine (about 70 kV, uA); the capacitors "sought a position of stable equilibrium in the East-West direction, where they remained 'locked' until discharged". - He claims motion "has been observed for capacitors moving in vacuum or oil and also for plate capacitors with a dielectric where no ionization is possible", citing Brown via LaViolette, Szames's French book on the Biefeld-Brown effect, Naudin's ascvacuum page and Musha. - Academia.edu also lists Cornille, "Replication of the Trouton-Noble Experiment" (AES address) - lead. Bears on claim 1 (Naudin's co-inventor gives the theoretical frame for a non-ion-wind force) and on the "magnetic ether" account in the US 2005/0057116 patent (claim 6).

Bishop's MEG critique (named as missing in claims.md)

Shawn Bishop (Simon Fraser University and TRIUMF), "In Disdain of Garbage Physics", June 2002, 8 pp. Saved as research/files/Bishop-In-Disdain-of-Garbage-Physics-MEG-rexresearch.pdf from [web] https://www.rexresearch.com/meg/meg-debunked.pdf . Bishop analyses Naudin's MEG v3.0 test (two output coils on identical 100 kohm loads; Naudin's note that a "conditionned" 100 kohm load or a MOV "is REQUIRED"). From the scope screen he reads input as constant 28 V with an AC current of amplitude about 0.125 A and computes P_in = 28 x 0.125 / sqrt(2) = 2.47 W; output 500 V amplitude across 100 kohm; he argues output voltage of about 17 x input matches the 1500:100 turns ratio and that the device "is putting out the same amount of power as what it receives". Bishop's stance is openly hostile ("expose a fraud"); Cyril Smith's reply (in the folder) says Bishop used a wrong power formula. Reviewers can now check both sides against the same figures. Naudin's own rebuttal page meg/criticofsb.htm is linked from his MEG index (not yet read).

cheniere.org (Bearden)

http://cheniere.org/megstatus.htm did not respond to curl or Chrome (blank). The Wayback capture of 2022-01-17 [web] https://web.archive.org/web/20220117081133/http://www.cheniere.org/megstatus.htm is a link index ("Naudin's complete replication results and readings", "Status report updates - see Correspondence Section", DOE website copy, Nick Cook discussion, the Found. Phys. Lett. paper, "Funding Enquiries"). Partial.