NRGFromTheVac · Source catalogue
Every document in the project folder (2), as catalogued by the fact-finder (facts.json). Click a column heading to sort. The documents themselves are not published here.
| Type | Year | Title | How read | Text |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| article | 2012-2013 (comments 20 Sep 2012 - 9 Jun 2013; printed 9/18/13) | Cold Electricity | Scalar EM Research (blog post and comment thread) Scalar EM Research blog author (chadj2, 'Chad', per Investigator [web: research/2026-10-04-semresearch.md]); commenters Warren Kistenbroker, Andreas, Razor and others SummaryPrintout of a blog page (semresearch.wordpress.com/index/cold-electricity/) [read]. The post (pp.1-4) describes a YouTube demonstration by 'NRGFromTheVaccum' of a circuit in which a 24 V battery charges a 30 uF / 4000 VDC capacitor to about 200 V (170 V observed in the video) through an 800-turn bifilar coil (~30 ohm) on a ferrite core, with two switches closed and opened together. The video shows two kinds of spark at the same gap, one 'exothermic' and one 'endothermic' (cooling; frost reported at high voltage). The author offers two explanations: (1) a switching transient (inductor current continuity, voltage across windings charging the capacitor without battery current) and (2) ferroresonance of the ferrite core producing a 'neg-entropic' magnetic field. The comment thread starts on p.3 (30 comments, 20 Sep 2012 - 9 Jun 2013 [read: p.3, p.20+]); pp.5-22 hold most of them: one commenter (Andreas) reports building it with plain wires and the capacitor charging above battery voltage, but the same with a diode in place of sw2, then reports no effect with a bifilar coil of about 500 turns; Warren reports diode-dependent voltages (215-225 V peaks with old Russian detector diodes vs 100-115 V with 1N4148), neon lamps with purple discharge 'cold to the touch', and a Rodin coil said to output 'cold electricity'. chadj2 argues cold electricity is tied to positive charge/positrons, an 's-field', Floyd Sweet's barium-ferrite bifilar coils and the Genesis project negative inductor. Commenters also give conventional explanations (displacement current, high-voltage RF, switching-time overlap). No data files, schematics or measurements beyond quoted numbers; embedded links and images are missing from the text layer. Added after QE (re-read of pp.1-5): the post opens by naming Floyd Sweet's VTA and John Searl's device as devices that ran cold ('payday happens when it is cold ... a side effect of negative entropy') [read: p.1]. Warren, 21 Sep 2012: cold electricity acts 'longitudinally' and hot 'transverse'; cold is 'a negative mass electron'; cites the Avramenko plug, Dr. Stiffler's 'diode electrolysis' and a Moray-valve idea (alpha emitters ionizing germanium), 'I have yet to test this' [read: p.4]. chadj2, 20 Sep 2012: 'mass is an electromagnetic effect' and a proposed test: drop two identical objects from a tower, one magnetized, do they fall at the same speed? [read: p.4]. chadj2, 13 Oct 2012: in his Stiffler energy-collection device an LED lit 'to a lesser extent even at audio frequencies as low as 100Hz', and only the 1N4148 and old RF crystal diodes worked [read: p.5]. The same comment points to Paul Brown for radioactive-decay power. Investigator leads (web, not in the printout): the inventor's other lost videos ('Free Electrical Energy 2', 'Cold Electricity Light Bulb', a frost video) and a Reiyuki post (Energetic Forum, 14 Apr 2009) of a CSET/Gray-tube replication at 6 kV or more [web: sites.md]; later blog comments by Ivo (2022-23) and Bertilo (2016) [web: research/2026-10-04-semresearch.md]; CitizenDC's bifilar build with strands knotted in parallel [web: Energetic Forum thread 2711]. Key claims
Relevance: The only text source in the project; it states the claimed phenomenon, the proposed explanations and the replication attempts of NRGFromTheVacuum's demonstration. Mainstream conflict: The 'cold electricity', positron-carrier, s-field and negative-magnetic-field ideas conflict with standard electromagnetism and QED. The basic voltage gain above battery voltage from a switched inductor (inductive kick) is, however, standard behaviour of inductors; the commenters themselves raise this and displacement current as conventional explanations. Cooling at the spark gap and frost are reported without measurement. | digest + deep read (pp.5-22, comment thread) + QE re-read of pp.1-5 extracted text (post body and first comments) | yes |
| image | unknown | Hand-annotated screen capture of the circuit from the video unknown (annotation on a video frame) SummaryA screen capture of a whiteboard drawing titled 'What was he trying to show us?' (drawer unknown), taken from a video frame [read: page image]. Labels: capacitor '30 F' (no micro sign visible; the blog gives 30 uF) '4000VDC', with '200+V' on its + wire; coil '800 Turns Bifilar coil' with a core drawn and '30 Ohms' (the capital O of 'Ohms' sits against the 30 and can be misread as 300; an earlier version of this entry wrongly said 300 ohms); a rotor ('Rotor Here') with a dashed contact circle; switches S1 (at battery -) and S2 (at battery +); battery 'x2', '24V', red '24V DC 10AH'. Left-edge and top-right labels are cropped ('-Cap', 'Gap', '...TOR'). Wiring (deep read): battery + connects through S2 to the capacitor + node, which is also rotor contact 2; the capacitor - terminal goes to the other fixed rotor contact; the coil top lead goes to the moving contact; the coil bottom lead goes through S1 to battery -. So, as drawn, the battery is in series in the capacitor charging path while S1 and S2 are closed, and the rotor is a single-pole two-way commutator (sequential, not simultaneous); dwell and break/make order are not shown. 'No closed loop' holds only after both switches open. Polarity labels suggest the order contact 2 (energise coil) then capacitor - (transfer) [inference of the deep reader] [read: page image]. Key claims
Relevance: Gives a drawing of the circuit the blog post describes. Image and blog agree on 30 ohm (probably not independent: both describe the same video); the inventor's own relayed figure is 4.7 ohm [web: sites.md], an open conflict. The wiring puts the battery in the charging loop, which bears on the blog's 'no closed current loop' (claim 1). Mainstream conflict: none (a circuit diagram) | page images (viewed directly; OCR produced only 5 characters) + Opus deep read (enlarged crops, deep/ancilary-circuit-0790f9.md) | none |