Meyl-Konstantin · Source catalogue

A 10-page essay in the Journal of Vortex Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (2012), Article ID 235563, doi:10.4303/jvst/235563, Ashdin Publishing (received 16 March 2012, accepted 15 June 2012; sole author, address 1st TZS, Villingen-Schwenningen). It argues by analogy from fluid vortices (rigid-body vortex versus 'potential vortex', Rankine vortex, tornado, centrifuge) that a dual 'potential vortex' of the electric field must exist in poorly conducting media and dielectrics, with electric conductivity playing the role of viscosity. The paper itself says the potential vortex 'has only been postulated and not mathematically derived' (p.4) and prints no field equation for it; the 'extended law of induction' is described in words only, and the vector of potential density b is given in [V/m] (the deep reader finds it must be V/m^2). It sets div B != 0 (eq. 6; the text layer drops the 'not equal' sign, confirmed on the page image) and cites the 3 Sept 2009 Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin announcement of 'magnetic monopoles' as reason to drop the vector potential. The measured evidence is: (a) a log-log sketch (Fig. 10) comparing the hf/(1-exp(-hf/kT)) noise curve with capacitor loss; (b) Fig. 11, one plot of tan delta against frequency (0.1-100 kHz) for a standard MKT (metallized polyester film) capacitor, with three straight lines: measured (about 4 to 21 on an axis with no multiplier printed), 'orthodox' Lorentz-model calculation (slope 1) and Meyl-model 'potential vortex' calculation (slope about 0.2), caption 'qualitative comparison'; it is attributed to a 2010 bachelor thesis (T. Treskatis, Konstanz, ref. [19]) made with an unnamed colleague; no capacitance, voltage, temperature, instrument, model formula or fitted parameter is given; (c) Fig. 12, photographs of circular marks on metallized polypropylene capacitor electrodes at 450 V / 60 Hz / 100 C / 110x after 40 h and 52 h, which are reproduced from Yializis, Cichanowski and Shaw (IEEE ISEI Boston 1980) and discussed by Taylor (IEEE Trans. EI-19, 1984), titles that speak of electrode corrosion. Further statements without data: Kirlian 'phantom leaf' photos by students (1991), blood 'roll' phenomenon attributed to 'Scheller' (citation mismatch), water colloids falling apart at 41 C, 10 mV per liquid crystal causing death. History passages (Tesla showing Kelvin scalar waves in 1887 while reporting a 1893 meeting; Thomson as Maxwell's successor; Maxwell quote cited to a Kelvin paper) contain date and citation inconsistencies noted by the deep reader. Five of 21 references are Meyl's own, four published by his own firm INDEL GmbH.

Key claims

• Dielectric losses in capacitors are not polarization or conduction losses but the decay of 'potential vortices' of the electric field (vortex losses).
• The textbook complex permittivity implies a complex speed of light and is therefore physically wrong.
• The law of induction must be extended by a potential-density vector b (stated in V/m in the paper), which is equivalent to div B not equal to zero in dielectrics.
• The frequency dependence of the measured loss factor of a standard MKT capacitor is matched by the Meyl vortex-loss calculation and not by a Lorentz-model calculation (Fig. 11, qualitative).
• Antenna and resistor noise, capacitor loss and eddy-current loss share one characteristic curve shape because noise is the frequency conversion done by decaying vortices.
• Circular structures on the aluminium electrodes of operating metallized-film capacitors (450 V, 60 Hz, 100 C, 40-52 h) are visible proof of potential vortices.
• The 2009 Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin 'magnetic monopole' result makes the vector potential A unusable and div B = 0 invalid.

Relevance: The cleanest published statement of Meyl's dielectric-loss/capacitor test, the one place where his theory is offered against measured data (Fig. 11); it shows what the data are (one qualitative plot from a bachelor thesis) and what is missing (the model formula, parameters, raw data, the Treskatis 2010 thesis).

Mainstream conflict: Disagrees with textbook dielectric theory (complex permittivity, Debye/Cole-Cole/Jonscher relaxation plus series-resistance loss) and with div B = 0. Deep reader notes (tagged [memory]): complex epsilon makes the in-medium wavenumber complex, not the vacuum c; a constant tan delta is what rate-independent hysteresis predicts; the thermal-noise rise sits near kT/h = 6 THz, about 8 decades above the capacitor range in Fig. 11; the Lorentz oscillator is not the usual comparator; the 2009 spin-ice monopoles are emergent sources of H/M and leave microscopic div B = 0. These are the deep reader's readings, left to the reviewers.

An amateur-engineering text, (c) 1996 Robert Shannon, titled 'Notes on Scalar Detector Designs', that classifies 'scalar detectors' by translation mode (magnetostatic, electrostatic, both), bandwidth, linearity and passive/active type, and compares the 'Dea/Faretto' magnetostatic detector (as drawn by Thomas Bearden in 'Fer-de Lance', a briefing on alleged Soviet scalar weapons, via 'Bedini's version'), the Hodowanec 'gravity wave detector' (electrostatic, op-amp circuit), a neon detector, and the author's own 'Barkhausen Effect Detector'. The latter is a biased strip of polycrystalline silicon steel in a shielded permanent-magnet field with a coil of over 1200 turns feeding an audio amplifier, said to give 'thousands of pulses per second from scalar background noise alone', in the low microvolt range. Build instructions, suggested modifications (bucking magnet, bias coil, arrays, a 'Barkhausen Effect Battery'), and a 'scalar test pulse generator' (SCR discharging a capacitor bank through a caduceus or bifilar 'net non-inductor') are given. No measurements are reported for any variant. The author calls the Dea/Faretto design largely impractical and says no original publication by Dea or Faretto was found. The document is a different author's work, filed in the Meyl folder. It does not mention Meyl in the digest. It matters as a parallel use of the word 'scalar' (Bearden's usage, potentials as physical entities) that differs from Meyl's use (longitudinal wave along E or H). Meyl himself names Bearden in the 2001 lecture 'Fortschrittliche Konzepte' as one of two serious attempts at a field description of scalar waves.

Key claims

• A silicon-steel strip biased by a permanent magnet and read through a coil of over 1200 turns gives thousands of Barkhausen pulses per second from 'scalar background noise' alone.
• Changes in a shielded magnet's magnetostatic scalar potential, not electromagnetic radiation, modulate the Barkhausen pulse rate, so artificial scalar signals can be told from the background on an oscilloscope.
• A coil tuned to resonance at the background transition rate could supply a weak current to a load (the 'Barkhausen Effect Battery').

Relevance: Context only: third-party 'scalar detector' literature in the same field as Meyl's call for scalar-wave measuring instruments. It does not describe Meyl's work and is not evidence for or against his claims.

Mainstream conflict: The 'scalar potential' signal channel is Bearden-style and has no counterpart in standard electromagnetism; the physical readings of the Barkhausen noise (a well-known magnetization-noise effect of ferromagnets) as scalar-wave detection is not mainstream. Not weighed here (digest only).

PIERS (Progress In Electromagnetics Research Symposium) Proceedings, Stockholm, 12-15 Aug 2013, pp. 930-935; Meyl at Furtwangen University. It continues the author's PIERS 2012 Moscow paper ('Self-consistent electrodynamics', Poynting vector derived with one loss term) with the stated aim 'to prove the losses of capacities'. Seven sections: introduction (vortex losses), field theory 'from Maxwell's desk', vector potential, Helmholtz ring vortices in the aether, noise intensity of the capacitor, capacitor losses, 'the visible proof'. It contains only six equations (1)-(6), all textbook definitions on pp.1-2 plus the postulate div B != 0 (eq. 6); there is no derivation of a vortex-loss formula. The 'calculation as potential-vortex-losses acc. to Meyl-model' exists only as curve (c) of Fig. 3, a three-line log-log plot of tan delta against frequency for an MKT capacitor from a 2010 Konstanz bachelor thesis (Treskatis, listed as ref. [15] but never cited in the text; the figure cites [17], Taylor's corrosion paper). The same Fig. 2 noise curve, the same 'visible proof' photographs (Yializis 1980, 450 V/60 Hz/100 C, 40 h and 52 h) and the same history passages (Kelvin, Tesla, Helmholtz, with the 1887/1893 date conflict) appear as in the 2012 Ashdin paper. The abstract cites 'Science and Nature' 2009 on magnetic monopoles from the German Helmholtz Society; the text cites '[9 Science, and others]' but ref. [9] is Maxwell's 'Atoms' (dated 1798 in the list, an impossible year) and the real source is the Helmholtz press release [12]. The deep reader confirms the 2009 report is real (Morris, Tennant et al., Science 326, 411; spin ice Dy2Ti2O7). No tan delta scale factor, capacitor data, instrument or model parameters are given; the measured line rises about fivefold over 0.1-100 kHz (tan delta proportional to f^0.24), which the deep reader describes as consistent with ordinary MKT behaviour.

Key claims

• Since the 2009 monopole announcement the third Maxwell equation div B = 0 describes only a special case and the vector potential A is no longer usable.
• Dielectric loss of a capacitor is vortex decay, not a complex permittivity, because a complex epsilon implies a complex speed of light.
• A potential-vortex loss calculation fits the measured loss factor of a standard MKT capacitor (0.1-100 kHz) much better than the Lorentz-model calculation.
• The noise power of a resistor and the loss power of a capacitor follow the same hf/(1-exp(-hf/kT)) curve.
• Circular marks on the aluminium of high-tension capacitors in long operation are a visible proof of electric-field vortices.

Relevance: Later (2013) restatement of the capacitor-loss test, showing no new data or derivation after the 2012 paper; it is the place to check what Meyl's 'model' formula would be (not printed) and which records are needed (PIERS 2012 paper, EMC Journal 1995, Treskatis thesis 2010).

Mainstream conflict: Same points as the 2012 paper: complex epsilon versus vacuum c, constant tan delta from hysteresis/Jonscher loss, ESR loss in film capacitors, fluctuation-dissipation link between noise and loss, kT/h ~ 6 THz versus kHz capacitor range, spin-ice monopoles leave div B = 0 (deep reader's [memory]-tagged notes, mostly high confidence). The deep reader also notes 'curl B' printed where 'div B' is meant (p.2).

An English translation of an extract from Meyl's 2003 'Scalar Waves' book (not a peer-reviewed paper; no journal named). It presents the shortest complete form of the 'derivation': take Faraday's motional law E = v x B (eq. 1, 'unipolar induction') and the 'equation of convection' H = -v x D (eq. 2) as the only starting points ('without postulate'), take their curl, replace (v.grad)B and (v.grad)D by dB/dt and dD/dt, and obtain rot E = -dB/dt + v div B = -dB/dt - b (eq. 8) and rot H = dD/dt - v div D = dD/dt + j (eq. 9). Maxwell's law is the case b = 0, i.e. div B = 0; Meyl keeps b = -v div B, writes it as B/tau2 (eq. 14) by duality with j = D/tau1, and gets the 'completely extended' induction law rot E = -dB/dt - B/tau2 (eq. 16). With sigma = 0 this gives a wave equation with vortex damping (24), and for propagation along x the damping term is rewritten as -v^2 grad div B (eq. 25), giving the 'general wave equation' v^2 grad div B - c^2 rot rot B = d^2B/dt^2 (eq. 26): longitudinal with arbitrary v, transverse with c. For v = c it reduces to the ordinary wave equation (eq. 21). A scorecard (Fig. 5) lists what follows from the dual approach (Maxwell's equations, wave equation with transverse and longitudinal parts, scalar waves 'Tesla/neutrino radiation', vortex and anti-vortex, Schroedinger and Klein-Gordon equations) and what from Maxwell (only transverse waves). Technology claims: energy collection from noise vortices, and independent modulation of wavelength and frequency (brain at 10 Hz 'more efficient' than 1 GHz computers). There are no experiments, measurements or numbers of Meyl's own; equation numbers jump from (16) to (21). The deep reader checked the vector identity (correct) and the algebra of (13), (24), (26 with v=c); and lists problems for the reviewers: eq. (6) mixes the convective and the partial time derivative; Gauss's laws are assumed rather than derived; b = -v div B is a magnetic-charge current; (14) forces B parallel to v; (25) holds only in one dimension; v changes meaning from frame velocity to wave speed; no value for tau2 or v; the units table lists sigma as Vm/A (resistivity unit). Neutrino statements are three sentences with no numbers (Pauli's neutrino, 'scalar waves (Tesla/neutrino radiation)', energy from noise).

Key claims

• Maxwell's equations follow from Faraday's E = v x B and the convection law H = -v x D only under the restrictive condition b = 0, i.e. div B = 0, so Maxwell's theory is an approximation.
• The neglected term b = B/tau2 describes 'potential vortices' of the electric field and is the anti-vortex dual to the eddy current.
• The extended field equations give a wave equation with a longitudinal part (v^2 grad div B) of arbitrary propagation speed v alongside the transverse part at c (eq. 26).
• Neutrinos are such field vortices and travel as scalar waves, so neutrino radiation could be used as an energy source.
• Antenna noise proves the existence of potential vortices, and the noise power of the surroundings could be tapped for energy.
• Scalar waves allow wavelength and frequency to be modulated separately, giving an additional dimension of information transfer.

Relevance: The core derivation of the extended field theory in compact form, and the source for the central mathematical claim (scalar waves from div B != 0 with free speed v). Needed to see exactly which steps are assumptions.

Mainstream conflict: Disagrees with Maxwell's equations including div B = 0 and with the mainstream reading that E = v x B and H = -v x D are first-order field transformations consistent with Maxwell plus the Lorentz force. Deep reader's [memory]-tagged points: Maxwell's own 1865 and 1873 equations contained the v x B term; near-field radial fields of a Hertzian dipole follow from Maxwell with div B = 0; no magnetic monopole has been found (MoEDAL); mainstream neutrino fluxes give about 2e-5 events/s per cubic metre of water, far too small for an energy source. Left to the physicist.

A German popular-technical article in 14 numbered sections that condenses the Part 1 lecture on 'Elektromagnetische Umweltvertraeglichkeit' (INDEL 1996, 2nd ed. 1997). Maxwell's wave equation is split by the Delta operator into grad div and double curl; setting the divergence part to zero leaves Hertz's transverse wave, setting the curl to zero requires a source field (charge carriers, quanta or 'Wirbelstrukturen') and gives a longitudinal 'stoss' wave that Meyl identifies with Tesla's 1890 waves. Lord Kelvin's 1897 New York visit and Tesla's Electrical Experimenter article of Feb. 1919 are cited for Kelvin 'confirming' the longitudinal wave; quantum physicists led by Planck from 1902 are said to have 'flattened' vortex and ether ideas. Earthquake P/S waves and radio ground waves are used as analogies. Tesla's US patent 787,412 (18.4.1905) is cited for a signal speed of 471,240 km/s, and a Tesla letter on Einstein (Columbia, 15.4.1932). Tunnelling experiments at Cologne (microwaves), Berkeley (photons) and TU Wien (laser light), refs Chiao et al. 1993 and Enders and Nimtz 1993, are said to show 2-5 times c and to be 'replicated worldwide' (no citation). A wave can roll into a vortex spontaneously without energy loss; EMC measures that reduce radio emission also reduce the scalar part but give no safety; deliberately worsened phone antenna coupling is said to raise the longitudinal share; D-network digital signals are said to be more harmful than analogue ones. A frequency-velocity diagram (Bild 1) is used to say about 100 instruments would be needed for the whole field. Tesla's Colorado Springs demonstration (10 kW, 200 lamps of 50 W lit 42 km away, horses' shoes giving shocks) is retold from secondary accounts. Meyl demands public funding for 'Teslawellen' research, measuring instruments and limit values, and proposes receivers near masts to collect the radiation.

Key claims

• Setting the curl part of the wave equation to zero gives a longitudinal wave (Tesla radiation) that coexists with the Hertzian wave in every antenna.
• Longitudinal vortex waves tunnel through a Faraday cage, so shielding mats and wallpapers do not protect against electrosmog.
• Worsening the coupling of a mobile-phone antenna to meet a range specification reduces the radio wave and increases the longitudinal part.
• Digital pulsed (D-network) signals roll waves into vortices more readily and are therefore more harmful than analogue AM/FM.
• In perfect resonance 100% of the transmitter power reaches a resonant receiver and the received power does not fall with distance.
• Tesla measured a longitudinal signal speed of 471,240 km/s in his 1905 patent.

Relevance: Short statement of the health and electrosmog thread of the project (the EMC motivation behind the theory) and an early statement of the tunnel-experiment and Tesla-speed arguments.

Mainstream conflict: Longitudinal electric waves in vacuum, shielding penetration by 'scalar waves', and mobile-phone harm via a scalar share conflict with Maxwell-based EMC and with the mainstream bioeffects literature; tunnelling experiments are read by mainstream physics as group-delay effects of evanescent modes without signal speeds above c (per the textbook deep read, [memory] medium). Not weighed here (digest only).

Paper for the colloquium 'Erdexpansion - eine Theorie auf dem Pruefstand', 24/25 May 2003, Bergbau- und Industriemuseum Ostbayern, Schloss Theuern (organisers: museum friends' association and TU Berlin); author at FH Furtwangen. Part 1 gives a neutrino model of mass growth, part 2 the working of the growing Earth core. Meyl credits Hilgenberg (1933) as pioneer of Earth expansion but rejects Hilgenberg's aether-stream physics and replaces it with neutrino absorption. Calculation: conservation of angular momentum J*omega = (2/5) M R^2 (2 pi/t) with n = 2 (constant mass) or n = 5 (constant density); using the measured lengthening of the day (0.71-0.73 s per year, from PTB leap seconds, 32 s since 1958, and a popular-press figure of 1/500 s per day) he gets circumference growth of 45 cm/yr for n = 2 ('false', above the roughly 25 cm/yr he takes from I. Perrin's analysis of NASA data, 7.79 or 7.94 cm/yr diameter) and 18-19 cm/yr for n = 5 ('confirmed'). The mass to be collected is 8e16 kg per year, '72e32 Nm' (7.2e33 J). The deep reader reproduces all figures but only if t is one year (dt/t = 2.25e-8), which the paper does not state, and notes there is no compound-interest calculation in this paper. The neutrino model: a neutrino oscillates between electron and positron states (zero mean charge and mass, nonzero RMS), is superluminal (Tesla, NY Times 1932, Moray), and the measured rest mass is called an artefact of slowing in the detector tank; Kamiokande 3 billion/s cm^2 versus Gallex 66 billion/s cm^2 is read as 96% materialising to electrons and 4% to positrons, so 4% of neutrino input makes the Sun shine and 96% makes it grow; 'only half as many solar neutrinos at night' (also credited to Henry Moray in the 1930s) means the missing half is absorbed in the core. The interior: gas outer core and plasma inner core, atoms collapsed to neutrons, a core at 0 K and superconducting. Juvenile water 1 km^3/yr and petroleum refilling are listed. No fitting-continents reconstruction is given. Cited geophysics is mostly Perrin and Gottfried (NCGT proceedings) and popular-press items. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Digest inputs recorded by the QE agent: Kamiokande '3 billion' against Gallex '66 billion' solar neutrinos per cm2 per s is read as '4 % positrons, 96 % electrons' [read: digest p.4]; the two detectors have different energy thresholds and see different parts of the solar spectrum, so the ratio is not a charge split [memory, high]. The sign of the argument is Meyl's, not the detectors'.

Key claims

• The Earth's circumference grows by 18-19 cm per year at constant density, as derived from angular-momentum conservation and a day lengthening of 0.71-0.73 s per year.
• The Earth gains about 8e16 kg of mass per year (7.2e33 J mass-energy), which neutrino absorption can supply.
• The Earth, Sun, planets and stars grow by absorbing neutrinos, which are superluminal electron/positron-oscillating vortices.
• Half of the solar neutrinos missing at night in detectors are absorbed in the Earth's core, which proves neutrino absorption.
• The Earth's inner core is a gas/plasma mixture at 0 K that is superconducting and produces geomagnetism.
• Juvenile water (1 km^3 per year) and refilling of oil fields come from the growing core.

Relevance: The earliest (2003) form of the Earth-expansion claim, with the only energy and mass numbers Meyl gives in this paper; the 2015 J. Geol. Geophys. article repeats it.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with plate tectonics and space-geodetic limits on any change in Earth radius, with the iron-core model, and with neutrino cross-sections. Deep reader's recomputation: the requirement 7.2e33 J/yr is about 2.3e26 W (about 60% of the Sun's luminosity) and exceeds even total absorption of the quoted solar neutrino flux by a very large factor (the deep read of the 2015 English version put it at about 10^10); the measured lengthening of the day is of order 2 ms per century ([memory] medium), roughly 100 times smaller than the dt/t used; angular-momentum exchange with the Moon is omitted. These are the deep readers' notes, not verdicts.

The only independent experimental test of Meyl's kit in the folder. Six authors writing as the private Institut fuer Gravitationsforschung in Waldaschaff (Bavaria; the deep reader notes that they are not described as students anywhere in the document) bought and tested the experiment set Meyl sells, following the kit manual. Instruments: Fluke 45 and 85-4 multimeters, Tektronix TDS 3054 500 MHz oscilloscope, Kathrein MFK 55, Fluke 6062A generator, HP 8594 EM spectrum analyser, Fluke PM 6304 RCL meter, plus home-made inductive and capacitive probes and a ferrite current transformer on the one-wire link. They first reproduced the manual's effects (receiver LEDs lit while transmitter LEDs dark), which they judged of low relevance because the manual contains no error analysis. After removing an inverter's 6 MHz interference (battery/DC operation) and avoiding earth connections, they found a lowest resonance at 5.35 +/- 0.1 MHz and mapped a standing wave at 29.5 MHz along both spiral coils (current nodes and antinodes, 180 degree phase flips at each null, total line length about 18.8 m), concluding that the Tesla circuit is 'a shortened, coiled dipole antenna'. The one-wire link carried 3.4 mA rms, 28% of the oscillator current, whereas the IGF report says Meyl expects it to be zero. Receiver LEDs lit brighter than the transmitter's with no transmitter sphere present. LED non-linearity (clipping at about 1.7 V) generates strong odd harmonics (e.g. 3rd harmonic 1.4 times the fundamental), which explains the 'back-reaction' and the receiver LED lighting. Distance test (Fig. 4): received power about 8 mW at 17 cm, 4.3 at 27, 3.3 at 37, then flat at about 3.1 mW from 47 to 67 cm (read from a chart; frequency, power-measurement method and wire length not stated). Efficiency by eye-matching LED brightness: 8.5 mW received versus 19 mW in (1.2 V x 16 mA), about 45%. 'Faster than light' argument: no simple relation between wire length and wavelength because of the sphere capacitances. Conclusion (p.13): none of Meyl's hypotheses could be confirmed; all effects can be explained by standing waves on a Lecher line in classical electrodynamics; no over-unity was observed. They also state that the Meyl kit differs so much in size and power from Tesla's apparatus that no conclusion about Tesla's experiments follows, that Tesla's experiments have not been exactly replicated for lack of funds, and that it is 'urgently needed' to do so. Gaps the deep reader lists: no Faraday-cage measurement though p.3 says it was checked; no wire-removed control; power by eye-matched LED; a wavelength inconsistency (56.07 m on p.6 versus 44.4 m on p.10); more detail in a separate Weidner/Zentgraf report at gravitation.org/Meyl2.html (not in the folder). Meyl's reply is on record in the CoMed interview (2003): a 'questionable private institute' that made only conventional measurements and dismissed everything unconventional as harmonics without measuring that. The deep reader recalls (memory, medium) that the IGF was supported by a private foundation sympathetic to unconventional energy research; not verified.

Key claims

• The Meyl kit's effects (receiver LEDs lit, transmitter LEDs dark) can be reproduced as the manual describes.
• The coiled Tesla circuit is a shortened dipole with standing waves at 5.35 MHz and 29.5 MHz whose nodes and phase flips match classical line theory.
• The one-wire link between transmitter and receiver carries 3.4 mA rms, 28% of the oscillator current, not zero.
• The 'back-reaction' and the receiver-LED effects are explained by strong odd harmonics generated by the LEDs.
• The kit's efficiency is below 50% (about 45% by LED brightness matching), so no over-unity effect occurs.
• None of Meyl's five kit claims (energy transfer, back-reaction, over-unity, 1.5 c, ineffective Faraday cage) could be confirmed as scalar-wave effects.
• The kit is too small and low-power to count as a replication of Tesla's apparatus, and a true replication has not been done.

Relevance: The one measured, independent test of the kit-based claims; it shows what was reproduced, what was explained classically, and what controls remain missing. Also the document where a third party says Tesla himself remains untested.

Mainstream conflict: None with mainstream; it is a mainstream-compatible explanation of the effects. It conflicts with Meyl's own claims. Its own weaknesses (eye-matched power, missing cage and wire-removed controls, wavelength inconsistency) are listed by the deep reader.

A lecture paper by Meyl (TZA, Steinbeis-Stiftung transfer centre, St. Georgen) on wireless energy transmission with 'scalar waves'. Argument: earthquakes show longitudinal waves arriving first; Hertz's wave is transverse, so where is the longitudinal part; antenna efficiency is 'well under 100%' and the textbook explanation (dielectric heat) is rejected because the wave equation has only vortices as damping; complex epsilon would give a complex c; antenna noise is 'the sought scalar-wave part' (wave rolling into a vortex shortens wavelength and raises frequency); a 'mathematical proof' splits the wave equation into rot rot and grad div, derives a plasma wave from a scalar potential, and treats Hertz as receiving the transverse and Tesla the longitudinal part; the near field has E-H phase shift 90 degrees, the far field 0 degrees; vortices decay within lambda/(2 pi) at v = c; only Bearden (original Maxwell with quaternion-era terms) and Meyl's own potential-vortex theory are called serious field-theory attempts. The five claims of the demonstration (wireless energy transfer, back-reaction, 'free energy with over-unity between 1 and 10', scalar waves at 1.5 c, ineffective Faraday cage) are listed without any measured power, voltage, current, distance or instrument; the efficiencies 'above 100%, up to 1000%' are attributed to buyers and 'some universities' (over 100 sets sold) without names, dates or methods. The 1.5 c figure uses the frequency ratio 7 MHz to about 4.8 (or 4.7) MHz with an assumed constant wavelength, and Tesla's 12 Hz earth resonance versus Schumann 7.8 Hz. Energy source: 'possibly the neutrino radiation around us'; 'less than 5%' of the received power comes from the near-field transmitter, so '95%' cannot (a 20-fold gain, which is above the stated 1000%). Meyl also offers an LC-circuit reading for claims 1-2 and says claims 3-5 need a new field-theoretical treatment. Setting: live demonstration in the foyer, an announced proposal 'on behalf of the University of Stuttgart' for wireless power to satellites or aircraft (outcome unknown), a seminar 14 July (2001) on operating without the earth line, Antaeus/Heracles as Tesla's supposed source for grounding. Meyl sells the kit and the books (stake). QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): The lecture says that if the earth lead is disconnected 'the oscillation stops' [read: digest p.15, cited by QE], and gives the over-unity figure as 'between 1 and 10'.

Key claims

• A resonant sphere-and-flat-coil pair transfers energy wirelessly over distances several times the near-field range with a measured efficiency between 100% and 1000%.
• Scalar waves travel at about 1.5 times the speed of light, derived from the frequency ratio 7 MHz to 4.7-4.8 MHz at constant wavelength.
• A Faraday cage cannot stop the scalar wave because fast vortices contract and tunnel.
• Less than 5% of the received power comes from the nearby transmitter, the remaining 95% from ambient (neutrino) radiation.
• Tesla's earth resonance of 12 Hz against the Schumann 7.8 Hz shows his wave travelled at 1.5 c.
• Antenna noise is the scalar-wave part of the radiated field.

Relevance: Shows the full claim set of the 2001 period with the explicit absence of any quantitative data in the lecture itself, and the first appearance of the 95%-ambient-energy argument.

Mainstream conflict: Over-unity, 1.5 c and cage penetration conflict with energy conservation, special relativity and shielding theory; the seismic P/S analogy is used without derivation. Deep reader flags internal number conflicts (4.8 vs 4.7 MHz; 1.5 c vs 1.6 c; factor 1-10 vs the implied 20x) and that the frequency-ratio argument needs a fixed wavelength for a lumped resonator.

A short German lecture handout by Meyl on the demonstration kit. It states the five claims (wireless energy transfer; back-reaction; 'free energy with an over-unity effect of approximately 10'; scalar waves at 1.5 c; Faraday cage ineffective) and gives the procedure: two identical Tesla coils with sphere electrodes driven by a function generator at 2-4 V (instead of Tesla's spark gap and kilovolts), self-resonance about 7 MHz, LEDs as indicators (receiver LEDs bright = U > 2 V, transmitter LEDs off = U < 2 V). Results as stated: tune until the receiver LEDs light and the transmitter LEDs go out; pull the receiver's earth lead and the transmitter LEDs light again ('the transmitter feels when its signal is received'); efficiency 'despite exchange of the coils 1000 percent' (elsewhere 500-1000 percent, from 'some universities'); lower the frequency to about 4.8 MHz (ratio written as 7/4.7) and the receiver lights again, dimmer, shieldable, without back-action, called the Hertzian part, so the scalar wave has 1.5 c at 'unchanged wavelength'; place the transmitter in an aluminium case and the receiver still glows, 'expert EMC laboratories cannot detect anything', electric not magnetic coupling, so the wave 'tunnels'. Theory slides: splitting the wave equation into rot rot and grad div, and a plasma wave from a scalar potential. Meyl's reasons against the conventional readings: the two identical air transformers should give output not larger than input; an equivalent circuit cannot reproduce 'receiver LEDs bright while transmitter LEDs go out'; the near-field transmitter supplies 'less than 10%' of received power, the 90% 'cannot come from the near field', and the energy is taken from neutrino radiation. Absent from the handout: transmitter-receiver distance, any voltage other than the 2 V LED threshold, coil dimensions, powers, instruments, method for the percent figures, the EMC laboratory's name. Kelvin's 'vortex transmission is radiation' remark and the 'universities confirmed' statement are single-source (Meyl, uncited). Meyl is the seller of the kit.

Key claims

• With the kit, receiver LEDs light while the transmitter LEDs go out, which classical air-transformer circuit theory cannot give.
• Pulling the receiver's earth lead relights the transmitter LEDs, showing the transmitter senses the receiver (feedback).
• The measured efficiency is 1000 percent even after exchanging the coils (500-1000 percent as measured by some universities).
• The resonance at about 7 MHz is a scalar wave at about 1.5 times the speed of light compared with the Hertzian response at about 4.7-4.8 MHz, at unchanged wavelength.
• A closed aluminium case around the transmitter does not stop the receiver LEDs from lighting, and EMC laboratories measure nothing outside the case.
• Less than 10% of the received power can come from the near-field transmitter; the rest is ambient neutrino radiation.

Relevance: The shortest primary description of the kit experiments and of the stated discriminator between 'Hertzian' and 'scalar' (shieldability, feedback, brightness at two frequencies).

Mainstream conflict: Over-unity, speed above c from a frequency ratio, and unshieldable transmission conflict with energy conservation, special relativity and EM shielding. The IGF test (see its entry) explains the effects as standing waves on a coiled Lecher line, LED-generated harmonics and conductor coupling. Handout gives no data to settle this.

A German interview book with seven parts: I interaction of the neutrinos (free energy, Tesla radiation = neutrino radiation, oscillating charge and mass), II scalar waves (chapters 4-12: Kelvin and Tesla, tunnelling experiments, noise, dowsing, mobile phones, unlicensed operation), III vortex physics, IV dual field physics (Faraday's law, 'hydromagnetic field', aether), V unified theory (field-dependent length, space curvature), VI practical use (railgun, RQM, Tesla coil, single-wire transmission), VII cosmic energy (galaxy rotation, supernova neutrinos, eclipse focusing). The interviewer von Buttlar is a sympathetic popular-science author (the publisher's blurb gives 'more than 28 million' books sold) and a co-promoter; the publisher is also the congress organiser of Magazin 2000 plus (stake). Part I presents the kit experiment (efficiency 'over 500 percent', 'a thousand percent' at Clausthal), Tesla's 10 kW Colorado Springs transmitter (flat coil of 880 m wire, 43 m tower), the NY Times 6 Feb 1932 neutrino statement, and the claim that Tesla radiation equals neutrino radiation named 'Neutrinopower'. In the deep-read pages Meyl says (all as his statements): the Faraday-cage demonstration works because the scalar part tunnels, though in a cage or tunnel the received signal cannot tell which share was scalar from the start (his own admission, pp.108-109); Chiao (Berkeley, 1.7 c), Krausz (TU Wien, 2.4 c) and Nimtz (Cologne, 2.5 c, a Mozart symphony at almost 5 c) as tunnelling results (numbers from von Buttlar); his 1.5-1.6 c from a frequency ratio at assumed fixed wire length; Tesla's patent speed 471,240 km/s; a noise argument comparing resistor noise, capacitor loss and eddy-current loss; dowsing and Earth grids; mobile phones (3 W emitted, about 3 microwatt arriving, a scalar phone would need only microwatts), school-learning and cancer 'selection' hypotheses, an unnamed Karlsruhe colleague calling scalar waves 'Kokolores', and a legal argument that broadcast waves violate Article 2 of the Basic Law; Dr. von Klitzing (Lubeck) cited without his endorsing a scalar interpretation; a 2500-year vortex tradition (Democritus, Empedocles, Leonardo, Helmholtz, Kelvin); the discovery of the potential vortex 'on New Year's Day 1990 at my desk'. Self-concessions: dowsing can be self-influenced, grid frequencies unknown, a true scalar telephone needs 40+ years. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Pages 1-60 (deep read). The demonstration is a pair of identical flat spiral coils with spheres, run in self-resonance; the receiver LEDs light while the transmitter LEDs go out. Meyl states 'keine physikalische Erklaerung' under classical ideas and offers 'vermutlich Raum-Energie' [p.17-18]. No frequency, voltage, current, coil data, distance or instrument is given. Efficiency is stated as 'ueber 500 Prozent' from current and voltage waveforms (his book) and, at the chair of energy technology of TU Clausthal, 'tausend Prozent ... zu ihrem eigenen Erstaunen' [p.18]; no names, date, report or definition of input and output. Meyl says the experiment 'ist jederzeit reproduzierbar' and in the same answer that place and time of a measurement cannot be influenced and 'erhebliche Schwankungen' occur with the day-night rhythm and 'kosmische Konstellationen' [p.19]. He recommends replacing the flat coils by cylindrical ones: the efficiency 'sinkt auf unter 100 Prozent' [p.20]; no data. Gallex and Kamiokande are described only in words (no numbers; the Kamiokande item says 'nachts nur halb so viele solare Neutrinos'; the published day-night result is a few percent, see the Super-Kamiokande lead). The Tesla/Kelvin narrative of pp.39-45 is Meyl's retelling and names the Electrical Experimenter without date or page; 'Morgan' does not occur in pp.1-60; the Colorado Springs receiver is placed 42 km away with 200 lamps of 50 W (10 kW, 100 % of the transmitter power) without a source. Tesla's New York Times text of 6 Feb 1932 (p.25) speaks of superluminal cosmic particle radiation; it does not mention collecting energy with a coil. Pages 223-302 (deep read). Railgun: 16.7 MJ in from a homopolar generator, projectile 0.317 kg, intended 4200 m/s, 'davon die Rede' 399 GJ out, factor 24000 [p.223]; source 'ueber das Internet', no engineer, place or date. The ratio is consistent (399e9/16.7e6 = 23,892); the kinetic energy of 0.317 kg at 4200 m/s is 2.80 MJ [calc]. Meyl gives the conventional Ampere-bridge explanation first and adds neutrino capture in the unipolar-induction field; the book prints 'B = v x B' where E = v x B is meant (page image p.226). He states that the many scaled-down replicas built by universities and hobbyists show no avalanche effect because the minimum energy is not reached, and that he has not built a model [p.227]. Magnetic converter visit [p.239-242]: an unnamed inventor, whose device was designed after Meyl's input at a congress, telephoned 'Der Konverter tut; drei Kilowatt Ausgangsleistung im Dauerbetrieb'; a coil set burned out above 10 kW; Meyl saw operation he describes as exceeding shaft input, with no readings. Asked whether he had measured: 'Ja, aber die Effekte liessen sich in meinem Labor bislang nicht reproduzieren ... einen Over-Unity-Effekt konnten wir noch nicht erreichen' [p.240]. Possible causes he lists: the test unit, the cabling, the radiation situation in the Black Forest, and the absence of the inventor, who might act as 'Feld-Modulator' [p.240-241]. Of Seike's Moebius windings: 'Von meinen Nachbauten war allerdings keines funktionstuechtig, aber das will noch nichts heissen' [p.238]. RQM: run at 100-400 W (claimed capacity 10 kW and more), company bankrupt [p.237]. Stanley Meyer: 2.8 L water per 100 km and 'zehntausend Prozent' are the inventor's claims; death 21.3.1998 reported 'per Internet' [p.260-262]. Eclipse and earthquake claims [p.287-290]: Montserrat 26.2.1998, 11.8.1999 'Tuerkei', Salt Lake City tornado, 'Am 11.8.1999 ist es zu einer Beschleunigung der Erddrehung gekommen' (no data, no observers); the supporting articles are in NET-Journal 7/8-1999 and Magazin 2000plus 148, 150, 151 (footnote 24, p.298). Betelgeuse 'bereits implodiert' with fast neutrinos 'bereits bei uns angekommen' (p.286), pole reversal and flood (pp.290-293; Meyl: 'Ich hoffe nicht', p.291; 'Das sind Spekulationen' p.282). Funding: his staff 'werden aus einem privaten Spendentopf bezahlt' [p.295]. Back pages: kit prices 800 EUR and 1400 EUR, 'ca. 10 facher Over-Unity', 'ca. 1,5 fache Lichtgeschwindigkeit' [p.302]. Pages 133-222 (deep read, orchestrator fix 2026-10-08). No experiment is reported in these pages. Particle model: electron and positron are sphere vortices of opposite sense; the photon is an oscillating electron-positron pair; the neutrino a single oscillating ring vortex with swinging charge and any speed, 'auch schnellere als das Licht' [p.150-151]; passing neutrinos shake neutrons into beta decay [p.151]; anti-suns have a '50 Prozent' probability and are as common as suns [p.146]; the proton is an electron enclosing two positrons, its moment 'fast dreimal' that of a singly charged particle, and its magnetic axis said to point opposite its spin [p.155-156] (measured: parallel); the neutron is a proton plus an electron [p.158]; 'eine starke Wechselwirkung, die gibt es überhaupt nicht' [p.157], with a nuclear-force range of '10-3 Zentimetern' supplied by the interviewer [p.156]; electrons are 'sehr viel größer' than nucleons [p.219]; masses computed in his other books agree 'sehr gut' [p.159]. Field approach: Faraday's law and its dual as 'transformation equations' (Bosse 1967, Simonyi 1979 cited); the book misprints rot B for rot E [page image p.163] and 'B = v x µH' for E = v x B [page image p.171]; field factor (1 - v^2/c^2) [p.172]; 'B, H ~ 1/l^2' [page image p.186]; c ~ l, so c is 'eine simple Messkonstante' [p.194-197]. Meyl says the length law cannot be tested in a laboratory: 'ziemlich schwierig bis unmöglich' [p.193]; 'weder zu beobachten noch zu messen' [p.195]. Apollo: no stars because from the Moon (g/6) star distances grow 'auf das 36-fache' [page image p.191] (his own 1/l^2 gives 2.45). Michelson story with Maxwell commissioning 'Dr. Michelson' and Morley as a 'Trittbrettfahrer' [p.177-178] (Maxwell died 1879, before both experiments); slowed light at 17 m/s by 'a Danish woman scientist' [p.181]; the 1919 eclipse attributed to special relativity [p.200]; Earth orbits without gravity because the day side has shorter lengths [p.201-203]; gravity = closed field lines, electromagnetism = open ones [p.206-212]. Objectivity theory: time constant, lengths and c vary; energy conservation derived; 0.51 MeV bound inside the electron [p.220]; making energy from waves would cost 'mehr Energie ... als ich am Ende gewinne' [p.221]; vacuum energy 'derzeit ... keine brauchbare Technologie in Sicht' [p.222]. Annalen der Physik 1990 (deep read, pp.213-214): asked by the interviewer whether he tried to place his theory in 'der renommierten Zeitschrift' (the Annalen, named by the interviewer), Meyl says he submitted 'Potentialwirbel in der Elektrodynamik' in April 1990 and it was rejected. Grounds as he reports them: 'Es wurde argumentiert' (passive, no one named) that the potential vortex is dispensable because Maxwell's theory covers all phenomena; and 'so schreibt ein Gutachter', where it does not, 'reichen unsere Approximationsmethoden nur noch nicht aus'. No date of rejection, editor, referee or report is given. This is Meyl's own account in an interview book, ten years later; no second source is on record.

Key claims

• Tesla radiation is neutrino radiation, and a resonant Tesla-coil receiver can collect it as usable 'space energy' ('Neutrinopower').
• The kit shows efficiencies over 500 percent (1000 percent measured at TU Clausthal).
• Superluminal tunnelling (Berkeley 1.7 c, Vienna 2.4 c, Cologne 2.5 c to almost 5 c) shows that longitudinal vortex waves exceed the speed of light and cannot be shielded by a Faraday cage.
• Mobile phones with poorly matched antennas emit a biologically relevant scalar-wave share that instruments do not measure.
• Dielectric losses of capacitors and antenna noise are vortex losses and the vortex is the only damping term of the wave equation.
• Standing-wave 'Earth grids' and dowsing responses are scalar-wave phenomena.
• Broadcast waves violate Article 2 of the German Basic Law (right to physical integrity) and mobile masts need a licence for the scalar share.
• Meyl reports that his laboratory could not reproduce the over-unity effect of an inventor's 3 kW magnetic converter, and that small railgun replicas show no avalanche effect (Neutrino Power pp.227, 240).
• A railgun fed 16.7 MJ is said to have released 399 GJ (over-unity 24000); no named source ('ueber das Internet'), and the kinetic energy of the stated projectile is 2.8 MJ (pp.223-224).
• The Moon focuses solar neutrinos during an eclipse, which Meyl links to the 17.8.1999 Turkey earthquake, the 26.2.1998 Montserrat eruption, a Salt Lake City tornado and a speed-up of the Earth's rotation on 11.8.1999 (pp.287-290).
• Meyl reports that his April 1990 paper 'Potentialwirbel in der Elektrodynamik' was rejected (by the Annalen der Physik, as the interviewer names it), on the grounds that Maxwell's theory covers all phenomena and, in one referee's words, that uncovered cases only need better approximation methods (pp.213-214, Meyl's account).
• Field strength sets length (E, H ~ 1/l^2) and c is proportional to length, so c is only a 'measurement constant'; Meyl says this cannot be observed or measured from inside a laboratory (pp.186, 193-197).
• From the Moon (one-sixth of Earth's gravity) star distances grow 36-fold, so astronauts saw no stars (p.191); his own 1/l^2 law gives 2.45.
• The proton is an electron enclosing two positrons, whose magnetic axis points opposite its spin; the neutron is a proton plus an electron; there is no strong interaction (pp.155-158).
• Anti-suns are as common as suns (50 percent probability) (p.146).
• Neutrinos are oscillating ring vortices that can travel faster than light and cause beta decay by shaking neutrons (pp.150-152).
• Gravitation is the effect of closed field lines and electromagnetism of open field lines on the size of space; planetary orbits need no force (pp.201-212).

Relevance: The 2000 popular statement of the whole programme: neutrino identification, health claims, tunnelling and legal strategy; also contains Meyl's own concessions that the cage and tunnel tests cannot separate scalar from Hertzian parts.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with energy conservation (over-unity), with relativity (superluminal signals), with the mainstream reading of tunnelling experiments, with measured neutrino cross-sections, and with EMC and bioeffects consensus. Several statements are third-hand (unnamed institutes and professors). Not weighed here. The railgun, converter, Seike and Meyer items are second-hand or the inventors' own claims; the eclipse-earthquake links are single-event coincidences chosen after the fact (see the ch.20 deep read for the USGS and IERS checks).

Part 1 of a series. The text layer is complete but the PDF font itself prints epsilon, proportionality signs, the ring integral and a minus sign in eq. 17 as '?' or boxes; the deep reader restored them from context. Argument: the aether experiments gave contradictory answers; Einstein 'simply abolished' the aether although the speed of light is still finite and not constant; the electromagnetic field takes over the aether's role. The mathematics: E = v x B (eq. 1, called Faraday's law and said to be the cause of the induction law) and H = -v x D (eq. 2); substituting each into the other for the geometry v along x, H along y, E along z gives E_z = -(v^2/c^2) E (eq. 5), total field E_o = E (1 - v^2/c^2) (eq. 8), which Meyl then sets equal ('!') to the squared Lorentz contraction factor l^2/l_o^2 (eq. 10), giving E, H proportional to 1/l^2 (eq. 11): the Lorentz contraction is caused by changed field conditions. An appendix (eqs. 12-19) 'derives' Ampere's law from the transformations using a chain-rule step and defines the current density as what is left over; in the dual induction case a measurable E_o 'has no cause', which is the opening for potential vortices. Observations offered: Hubble Space Telescope 1990 blur (mirrors adjusted on Earth, 'telescope had become short-sighted') and no stars visible from the Moon (with one-sixth gravity, distances grow 36-fold). The deep reader's checks: all equations are dimensionally consistent; by Meyl's own stated vector geometry eq. 5 has the opposite sign (+v^2/c^2), so (8) would read E(1 + v^2/c^2); the special-relativity transformation raises the transverse field of a fast charge by gamma (7.09 at 0.99 c, against Meyl's 0.02); Earth's field cannot be a solar electric field crossed at orbital speed without an E of about 1.5e8 V/m; the Moon factor must be sqrt(6) = 2.45 from eq. 11, not 36; the Hubble blur was spherical aberration from a misassembled test corrector, fixed in 1993-94 with COSTAR/WFPC2. Historical slips: Michelson-Morley 'later repeated by Morley' is wrong (Miller etc.); Maxwell died in 1879 before Michelson's first run. No experiment is reported.

Key claims

• The electromagnetic field takes over the function of the aether, which Einstein wrongly abolished.
• Substituting Faraday's E = v x B and H = -v x D into each other gives measured fields E_o = E (1 - v^2/c^2) and H_o = H (1 - v^2/c^2).
• The Lorentz contraction is a physical consequence of changed field strength, with E and H proportional to 1/l^2 (eq. 11).
• The Hubble Space Telescope's 1990 blur arose because gravity is weaker away from Earth so lengths and distances to stars increased.
• No stars were photographed from the Moon because with one-sixth of Earth's gravity all distances to the stars grow 36-fold.
• The Earth's magnetic field is caused by a solar electric field that the Earth crosses on its orbit.
• Gravitation is an electromagnetic field effect (to be shown in part 2).

Relevance: Foundation of the 'theory of objectivity': it is where E, H ~ 1/l^2 and the field-dependent Lorentz contraction first appear, which every later claim on c ~ l, gravity and particle masses depends on.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with special and general relativity (field transformations, Michelson-Morley, Hubble history). Deep reader's [memory]-tagged points: Maxwell's 1865 equations contained the motional term; iterating a first-order transformation is not allowed; the exact Lorentz transformation is a group; Apollo 16 Carruthers camera photographed stars from the lunar surface; Fizeau 1851 contradicts exclusive Galilean addition. Left to reviewers.

Part 2 of the series. The deep reader's headline: this document derives no constants and no particle properties (no masses, fine-structure constant, G, charge or radii); the strong and weak interactions are said to be included but only in the books. It has two proportionalities, E, H ~ 1/l^2 (eq. 11, imported from part 1) and c ~ l (eq. 12). The argument: a standard metre bar and an observer change with the field, so the effect cannot be tested in an Earth laboratory; the only numeric claim is that on the Moon, where gravity is one-sixth, all lengths grow 36-fold ('the astronauts have become much larger'), 'confirmed' by Apollo astronauts who found Hadley Rille a shallow ditch, Mount Hadley a small hill, and the lunar-module-to-mountain distance about 100 m rather than several km. Gravitation is the differential contraction of a body in the Sun's field (so orbits come from space curvature rather than a force); attraction is a feedback loop between two particles' fields; electromagnetism is the effect of open field lines (unlike charges concentrate lines and contract lengths, like charges thin them out and lengths grow towards infinity) and gravitation the effect of closed lines running parallel to the particle surface. The speed of light is a 'measurement constant', not a natural constant, because c ~ l and it is measured with itself; Galilean velocity addition is said never to have failed. The deep reader's checks: the factor 36 contradicts eq. 11 (it gives sqrt(6) = 2.45); Hadley Rille and Mount Hadley belong to Apollo 15 (July-August 1971, the first lunar rover), not Apollo 11; the rover odometer (about 28 km) and LRO images agree with the maps; the argument that an observer co-moving with the field cannot detect it conflicts with the astronauts' claimed detection; electron and neutron magnetic moments contradict 'no measurable poles'; Fizeau 1851 contradicts exclusive Galilean addition; the ratio of electric to gravitational force (about 1e36) is not addressed. No source is given for the astronauts' statements. The follow-up particle-mass calculations are in the 2003 textbook (chapter 7).

Key claims

• Because E, H ~ 1/l^2, on the Moon (one-sixth of Earth's gravity) all lengths are 36 times larger, as shown by the Apollo 11 distance discrepancies.
• Gravitation arises from the effect of closed field lines on the dimensions of space, electromagnetism from open field lines.
• The speed of light is a measurement constant (c ~ l) and not a constant of nature.
• Two particles attract because each one's field contracts the distance, which raises the field further.
• The strong and weak interactions are included in the unification theory (derivations only in the books).

Relevance: Shows that the 'unification' in the articles is qualitative and that the only quantitative test offered (the Moon factor) is internally inconsistent and attributed to the wrong mission; the quantitative particle-mass work is in the 2003 book.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with special and general relativity, with the constancy of c and with Apollo/LRO/laser-ranging records. Deep reader's [memory]-tagged checks: Apollo 15 not 11; retroreflector distances to centimetre level since 1969; Kennedy-Thorndike, de Sitter, Alvaeger tests; Fizeau 1851.

An engineer's overview of 'Schwingungsmedizin' (vibrational medicine), written as opening lecture of a society for energetic and information medicine of which Meyl was second chairman. Systems are sorted by feedback sign. Positive feedback amplifies the person's own 'noise signal' or aura (syncrometer: hand/head electrodes, broadband amplifier, headphones; tone therapy; colour therapy; aromatherapy as 'vortex information'; gemstone therapy via natural frequencies; meditation as resonance with oneself). Negative feedback cancels it: homeopathy (Hahnemann's potentisation as information transfer to water), bioresonance (EKG/EEG/MEG pick-up, 180 degree phase turn; Heine noted that relevant molecular oscillations lie at 1 to over 10,000 GHz that electrodes cannot pick up), frequency therapy (Hulda Clark's tables of 'deadly' frequencies for parasites, 5-10 V sine signal, 7 min on / 20 min off), and the 'zapper' (9 V battery, MC 1455 timer, square wave, hand electrodes). The author says by present physics frequency therapy should not work (millimetre skin penetration); his proposal is that the scalar part 'tunnels' undamped to resonant places and destroys parasites by their own resonance, with unmodulated signals harming only unicellular parasites. He notes that treatment success cannot be checked directly in a living organism, that Clark omitted checks of permittivity and conductivity, that the zapper hits good gut bacteria too, and that immunity can develop, and reports 'astonishing results' and spontaneous cancer remissions from practitioners (unsourced). He closes by calling for a 'potential-vortex medicine' and calls conventional medicine a dead end. References are alternative-medicine books and CO'Med articles; no trial or measurement of his own.

Key claims

• A syncrometer that plays back a person's own amplified noise signal strengthens the aura and the immune system.
• Hulda Clark's frequencies from a 5-10 V sine generator destroy matching parasites in the body, with a cycle of 7 minutes on and 20 minutes off.
• A square-wave 'zapper' kills parasites and bacteria because the square wave contains infinitely many sine frequencies.
• The scalar-wave share of the injected signal tunnels undamped to resonant parasites, which die from their own resonance.
• Homeopathic potentisation transfers the information of a substance to the water by shaking.
• Chemical processes are accompanying effects, not the cause, of disease; potential-vortex medicine can cure what pills only treat symptomatically.

Relevance: Shows the medical and biological extension of the scalar-wave theory and Meyl's own statements of what cannot be checked; the zapper/Clark thread appears again in the 2003 textbook (chapter 24).

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with mainstream medicine and physics (no mechanism for frequency therapy, homeopathy, bioresonance); no trial data in the document. Author himself says current physics does not allow frequency therapy to work. Not weighed here.

The manual of the demonstration kit (800 EUR) and the experimentation kit (1400 EUR; later 'Scalar Wave Device SWG-A' 3950 EUR) with six experiments, written by the seller. No winding data, wire gauge, coil diameter or electrode size are published ('only identical parameters ensure reproducibility'), and kits are meant to be used with the kit's own generator (0.2-14 MHz sine/rectangle/triangle; elsewhere '1-20 MHz'). Hardware: two pancake coils with sphere electrodes, coupling coil 5 turns (4 optional), jumpers for LED, HF (100 ohm to the oscilloscope) and DC (bridge rectifier, 100 nF + 4.7 uF, 100 ohm) read-out, an aluminium suitcase that doubles as the cage. Experiments: (1) energy transfer, with LED brightness unchanged when the distance is quadrupled from about 50 cm (Meyl says the Hertzian prediction is 1/16); (2) feedback: unplug the ground cable and transmitter LEDs relight; (3) 'proof of free energy': HF measurement by scope or clamp gives 'approximately 500%'; a 'control survey' at TU Clausthal, Institute for electrical engineering, 6 July 2000, with two Tektronix devices averaged 1000% (no names, data or report); DC read-out typically 400 mV at the receiver versus 100 mV at the transmitter (the deep reader notes that is a rectified voltage at each load, not an input/output power ratio); (4) 'superluminal velocity': scalar point at 6-7 MHz (typical 6.7) versus radio wave at 4-5 MHz (4.5), ratio 1.4-1.6 'typically 1.5 c', plus Tesla's 12 Hz/7.8 Hz argument; (5) Faraday cage: aluminium suitcase, hamster cage or microwave oven with a conductive tie to the transmitter's ground; a 9 V battery inside excludes mains radiation; the cage shifts resonance down to 4-5 MHz, which is the band experiment 4 calls Hertzian; (6) 'refutation of the near-field interpretation': extending the ground cable beyond 6 m, receiver LEDs light (near field ends at lambda/(2 pi) = 6.8 m at 7 MHz); students said to have gone to 60 m (no data). The manual itself says 'a gap in the door or a cable... is adequate for a perfect coupling' and concedes that a ground connection regarded as a conductor needs a return, supplied by the transmission line. Absent: any test with the ground cable removed and nothing else connecting the coils, isolated-cage test, calibration of instruments at MHz, generator supply-power balance, time-of-flight measurement of 1.5 c, error bars, the collected user protocols. Preface: 'No scientist in the world is entitled to doubt Tesla's results as if he has repeated them 1:1' and 'ignorance is not a recognized science methodology'. The stake (sales prices on p.34) is the author's own. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Experiment 2 of the manual itself says: 'If the cable connection is carefully unplugged, the light emitting diodes installed onto the transmitter side shine again. The LED's, installed on the receiver side, extinguish' [read: _text, PDF p.19, QE reading]. This is Meyl's own description that the receiver lights only while the earth/cable link is in place. The manual also lists the SWG-A 'scalar wave device' at 3950 EUR, sold for placing substances with 'biological information' in the coil field [read: digest p.34]; this is a commercial stake that bears on claim 7.

Key claims

• Receiver LED brightness does not fall when the transmitter-receiver distance is quadrupled, in contradiction to the 1/16 power law of Hertzian waves.
• The receiver's draw is felt by the transmitter: unplugging the ground cable relights the transmitter LEDs and extinguishes the receiver's.
• The kit shows efficiencies of about 500% (own HF measurement) and 1000% (TU Clausthal, 6 July 2000), and a rectified DC voltage four times higher at the receiver than at the transmitter.
• The scalar resonance at 6.7 MHz versus the Hertzian one at 4.5 MHz at fixed coil length means a speed of 1.5 c.
• Transmitter, receiver and cable inside or around a metal cage (suitcase, hamster cage, microwave oven) keep transmitting, so no cage can shield the scalar component.
• Receiver LEDs stay lit beyond 6 m (and up to 60 m by students) via the ground cable, so near-field coupling is refuted.
• Unplugging the connecting cable switches the receiver LEDs off and the transmitter LEDs on again (kit manual, Experiment 2).
• The manual offers an SWG-A scalar wave device for 3950 EUR to imprint biological information (commercial stake, manual p.34).

Relevance: The primary source of every kit-based quantitative claim, with its own controls and gaps; the IGF report tested exactly this kit. Also the record of the seller's stake.

Mainstream conflict: Over-unity, c exceeded, cage penetration and distance-independent power conflict with energy conservation, relativity and EMC theory. Alternatives from the IGF test: standing waves on a coiled Lecher line, harmonics from LEDs, conductor coupling through the ground cable.

Meyl's complete statement of the theory and its applications, in three parts (Part 1 chapters 1-9 'Electromagnetic environmental compatibility', Part 2 chapters 10-20 'Free energy and the interaction of the neutrino radiation', Part 3 chapters 21-30 'information technical use'). Text layer is complete for prose but contains none of the equations (they are images); each deep reader rendered the pages. Core mathematics (deep reads). Chapter 5: Ampere's law with Ohm's law plus an added term in Faraday's law, -rot E = B/tau2 + dB/dt (eq. 5.4, 'duality'), gives the 'fundamental field equation' c^2 Delta E = d^2E/dt^2 + (1/tau1) dE/dt + (1/tau2) dE/dt + E/(tau1 tau2) (5.7); the algebra is correct, the only new physics is the B/tau2 term (a magnetic-current term), the 'Poisson' term (e) is a screened-Poisson term, tau2 ~ mu sigma is dimensionally incomplete and in conflict with p.70. With an exponential trial solution and omega = (1/tau1 + 1/tau2)/2 set equal to mc^2/hbar and tau1 = tau2, 5.7 is rearranged into a 'Klein-Gordon' form (with mass term of the wrong sign) and a Schroedinger form with a constant potential U = mc^2/2 and v = c (not a hydrogen potential). Chapter 7: electron/proton scalings (E ~ 1/r, m ~ 1/r^2, r ~ 1/(z E)) give m_p/m_mu = 9 (measured 8.88), muon 204 m_e (measured 207), neutron 1934 m_e (measured 1839, 39 times the real excess), tau 3778 m_e (8% high); tables of mesons and hyperons by 'amassing'; inputs are m_e, e, m_p = 1836 m_e and chosen structures. Chapter 21: wave equation split into grad div and rot rot; dropping the gradient 'integrates' with a constant that is set to -rho/epsilon; the 'plasma wave' dispersion printed is the transverse one; Meyl's own 21.8 and 21.9 together give d^2 phi/dt^2 = 0; the variable speed comes only from E, H ~ 1/v^2 (21.10). Chapter 26-27: 'Laplace versus Maxwell' (26.11 vs 26.12) combines the vacuum equation with the conducting-medium one; Fig. 26.2/26.5 pro-and-contra table; Faraday/Maxwell dual approach as in 'Faraday or Maxwell'; 27.27 'general wave equation'. Chapter 28-29: 'field dilatation' as a geometric series giving E0/E = 1 - v^2/c^2; golden-ratio result v = 1.618 c from c^2 = v^2 - v c with tau2 = r/c (sign error: outgoing wave gives 0.618 c; div E = 0 contradicts the longitudinal ansatz; the golden ratio is put in by tau2 = r/c); pi and e 'derived' (generic); chapter 30 reads ancient temples as short-wave stations (Meyl later calls the follow-up book a historical science-fiction novel). The epilogue says the field theory 'manages without one postulate' while the starting transformation equations 'can't be derived'. Chapter 11-13 (Earth growth; deep read): Pangaea covering a sphere of radius 3435 km under 8.78 km of water (unrounded 9.28 km); compound-interest growth of the core only, q = 1 + 2.8e-8 per year, giving 6.5 cm/yr diameter growth, 915e11 t/yr (9.15e16 kg/yr) and 10.2 cm/yr drift; the text says growth 'less than 0.1 mm per year' (wrong by 300 to 650 times against the book's own numbers); counter-rotating core (31/45 fold, period 31.6 min; centripetal 38 m/s^2 against g about 10.7); Moon recession 5.88 m/yr (lunar ranging about 3.8 cm/yr, memory high), Earth-Sun recession 1 km/yr, day 18.84 h at 200 Ma (algebra error, should be 6.9 h by his own premise); Hafele-Keating '214 ns' (sign error: 273 - (-59) = 332 ns, memory high); Tamarack mines plumb-line 'lengthening' of 20.9 cm (single hollow-earth web source; model 40 cm vs 47 cm). Chapter 14-20 (digest only): space-energy technology, Reich/Reichenbach/Schauberger, photosynthesis and lightning as neutrino conversion, railgun 'over-unity 24000' from unnamed reports, Testatika (Linden, 2 kW), Ecklin and Bedini magnetic converters ('over-unity up to 12.6'), RQM space-quanta manipulator, Moebius and flat coils, Patterson cell ('over-unity up to 4000', radioactivity down 80%), Stan Meyer water cell, Searl disc, Podkletnov weight loss (2-4%), own experiments: charge amplifier of 1989, capacitor-loss resonance measurement 11.06.1990 (silver-coated Q = 48 against 28 and 9 after removing the coating, resonance about 400 MHz; later repeats 'drowned in the mean variation'), a 1999 transmission line with 49 mW into 100 ohm, 233 mW input, 223 mW idle, 'net 10 mW' so 490% (fact-finder arithmetic, not in the book: 49/233 = 21% if the 223 mW idle consumption is not subtracted), and chapter 20 'cosmic experiments' (solar eclipse of 11 Aug 1999 as a neutrino lens, focusing 68 times or 27 times, Foucault pendulum and earthquake predictions, Nostradamus, Zhou's clock anomalies). Chapter 24-25: vibration medicine, nerve conduction, mobile phones and tinnitus. The book is the author's own series (he publishes through his firm and sells kits, p.649). Secondary literature listed on pp.652-654 includes supportive press and critics (Der Spiegel 21.5.2001; Rothdach in GeoForum 2003). QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Chapters 19-20 (PDF pp.401-455), deep read. Meyl calls the ch.19 experiments 'handicrafts' experiments, to 'check for myself' [p.404]. (1) Charge amplifier, 1989-1990: a pointer 'seemed to perform a wild dance'; no numbers, no controls [pp.401-406]. (2) Kirlian 'phantom leaf', about 1990: the leaf appears in a later exposure with no leaf; Meyl reads it as vortices remaining in the plexiglas; a student's spark-device test found no place dependence, which Meyl explains as the device chasing the vortices away [pp.407-409]. (3) Capacitor Q, 11.06.1990, FH Furtwangen HF laboratory, about 400 MHz: silver-coated package Q = 48 (average of 5 runs), silver polished off Q = 28, silver removed by dilute nitric acid Q = 9 (Meyl concedes possible acid damage); on repetition 'hardly a difference could be detected' and the results 'drown in the mean variation'; the colleague who proposed a joint publication withdrew (Q table on PDF p.411, narrative pp.410 and 412) [read]. (4) Microwave oven against hotplate, 22.10.1996, two students: the plotted microwave curve stays about 1-2 degrees C above the hotplate curve over 6 minutes while the caption says the microwave container 'remains colder' (the text and the figure disagree); one run per method, no masses or powers; Meyl notes 'every sceptic knows half a dozen alternative interpretations' [pp.411-414]. (5) Flat-coil receiver, from 1995: 50-100 mV blew the oscilloscope input diode, over half a volt in distant thunderstorms; his test for a longitudinal wave is that the amplitude falls again at tighter coupling; no controls [pp.415-418]. (6) Electrosensitivity test, 14.06.1997, electrobiology seminar: a woman who called herself extremely electrosensitive had to say every 5 s whether the grounding was clamped; 'After a training round her proportion of hits was lying at 100 percent!'; a second subject with a pendulum at the back answered correctly; Meyl 'repeated this experiment several times with different success'; trial counts and sequence not given; the experimenter who knew the state was in the room [p.418]. (7) Student high-voltage work, 22.1.1998: a fluorescent lamp glowed in the field of a self-built generator; they could not reach 511 kV [p.420]. (8) Scalar-wave transmission line, TZ St. Georgen, first success 12.10.1999, oscilloscope record dated December 1999, M. Andresen (diploma student) and M. Rehm (project leader), 6.7 MHz, spiral and cylindrical coils of 38 and 33 turns, 100 ohm load, LeCroy 9304C with current probe AP015 and differential probe AP032: transmitter input 233 mW with receiver on, 223 mW idle, receiver output 49.1 mW; Meyl: 233 - 223 = 10 mW, efficiency 490 %, 'did some parts evade our power measurement?' [pp.419-422]. QE-recheck calculation from the printed readouts: power factor about 0.055 (angle about 87 degrees), so about 1 ns of voltage-current probe skew changes the reading by about 178 mW and 56 ps equals the whole 10 mW; gross efficiency 49.1/233 = 21 % [calc]. (9) 'Neutrinolysis' after Stan Meyer, about 1999: no frequencies, currents or gas volumes; several hundred mV across 10 megohm from a water cell, with drift [p.422]. Ch.20 eclipse claims (PDF pp.424-455): the 11.8.1999 forecast was published two weeks earlier in NET-Journal 7/8-1999 pp.13-17: refraction of slow solar neutrinos by the Moon 'like a glass ball', focusing line Ulm-Augsburg-Freising, concentration 68 and, with 50 % solar share and 80 % focused, 27 times natural (text says 28, one figure plots about 3200 %, p.428 says 2800 %); predicted fluorescent lamps glowing, reactor problems, heart problems, self-inflammation; supporting premise 'at night only half as much solar neutrinos' (contradicted by the published Super-Kamiokande result). After-the-fact claims: 'a proven temporary acceleration of the rotation of the earth' and Foucault pendulum deviations (no source), Cyprus and Iran earthquakes of 11.8., Turkey 17.8 (7.8) to Taiwan 20.9 'in a rhythm of 6 to 7 days', Montserrat 26.2.1998, Salt Lake City tornado; radioactivity measurements near Munich showed 'almost no change' (reported null result). Dated forecasts: 29.3.2006 (rotation slowing; earthquake danger approx. 4.4.2006 for Crete and Asia Minor), 13.11.2012 ('no good'; SW Pacific), 21.8.2017 (South Carolina, Columbia, takes the role of Turkey), yearly deviations around 21 June, Betelgeuse 'could have exploded'. Third-party anomaly reports cited from Shu-wen Zhou (21st Century Science & Technology 12(3), 1999): spectral shifts in the annular eclipse of 23.9.1987, caesium clocks in Harbin on 24.12.1992 (t2 - t1 from about 602.6 to 601.7 microseconds), Allais-type pendulum force 24.10.1995, USNO clock pair 1989-1991 with six eclipses. First public-record checks by the deep reader [web]: USGS ComCat confirms the 1999 earthquakes Meyl lists (Izmit M7.6, Chi-Chi M7.7) but the global count of M6 and larger in the two months after 11.8.1999 was 27 against about 25 expected; the Cyprus M5.6 occurred about 4 h before the Moon's shadow reached the Earth; for 29.3-15.4.2006 nothing at Crete or in Anatolia, but an M5.5 on 4.4.2006 and M5.5-5.7 events on 11-12.4 in a swarm off Zakynthos (western Greece, about 400 km from Crete), and M5.3 south of Karpathos on 9.4; nothing notable after 13.11.2012 in the SW Pacific box (one M6.7 on 21.12.2012) or after 21.8.2017 in South Carolina. IERS EOP C04 length of day: the Earth slowed in the week after 11.8.1999 (mean 0.448 ms before, 0.586 ms after) and sped up after 29.3.2006 (LOD fell about 1.4 ms in a week), the opposite of both claims; both windows follow the 13.66-day zonal tide. Meyl's wording concerns the core and pendulums, which LOD does not measure. Chapters 8.2-10 (pp.183-241): Kelvin's 1897 mediation is sourced to Tesla's 'Electrical Experimenter, Feb. 1919, p. 732' only for the experiments; 'Both are right' has no citation of its own [p.202]. Colorado Springs: 10 kW, 200 lamps of 50 W at 25 miles (about 40 km), 'press reports at that time', no citation [p.202]. Patent US 787,412 (1905): 0.08484 s transit, 'approx. 6 Hz', 1.6 c with polar radius 6363 km [p.214]; the figures are mutually consistent only if the transit time is read as half a period (circumference 39,980 km / 0.08484 s = 1.57 c; 1/(2 x 0.08484 s) = 5.9 Hz) [calc]; elsewhere Meyl uses 12 Hz against 7.8 Hz. The 'oscillating interaction' for galaxies (ch.10) has no equation, rotation-curve data or flux budget. Chapters 14-18 (pp.295-400): every device figure is second-hand (Schneider, NET-Journal, Raum & Zeit Special 7, company statements). Railgun 16.7 MJ, 399 GJ, 24000 (cited to Galeczki and Marquardt 1997 p.139 and a web page; no test report); Kromrey >100 %; Testatika 1-2 kW (religious community; owners' description); Bedini 'up to 12.6' (1985, via Schneider); Coler 'at least four-fold' with a quoted claim of 450 % and 4.8 to 6.7 by named Berlin professors (one secondary source; documents confiscated, partly declassified 1962); RQM no input or output figure; Patterson cell 'over-unity of up to 4000' and radioactivity reductions 'up to 80 %' (Gruber, 28.5.97 visit); Stan Meyer 2.8 L per 100 km and 10000 % (inventor's claims; patents named); Hutchison; Searl; Podkletnov 2-4 % weight reduction at over 5000 rpm (Physica C 1992). Meyl's own assessments in the same chapters: 'I judge these measurements rather sceptical, after I already in three cases had to break the message gently to the inventors, that their device unfortunately was nothing but an energy destroying machine and they merely had measured wrong' and a request for closed-loop demonstration [p.346]; Testatika 'in principle entirely unsuitable for continuous operation' and 'There thus can't be talked of free energy' [pp.334, 336]; the end is reached 'in the case of numerous concepts' [p.346]; no closed-loop run is reported for any device. Kit advertisement on p.649: 'proof of free energy (1 to 3 times over-unity)'. Other numerical inputs: free-neutron lifetime 918 s (p.168; the measured value is about 880 s [memory, high]). Chapters 24.2-26.2 (pp.514-545): the medicine chapters cite practitioner books and trade journals (Kohler, Cousto, Clark, Co'Med, Lechner); no controlled trial, dose or sample size. Meyl's own caveats include 'It concerns here only a physical statement on the used methods of alternative medicine and not therefore, whether healing successes are actually possible' [p.514], that frequency therapy 'actually shouldn't be able to function at all' by present physics and that the zapper kills 'Good as well as Bad' [p.522], that bioresonance carries a risk that patients are 'worse off than before' [p.520], and, in the antenna-loss argument, 'eventually still heat is produced - agreed' [p.544]. Nerve conduction: node spacing 1 mm, speed 120 m/s, f = 60 kHz is a derived number, not a measurement.

Key claims

• Faraday's law must carry an extra term B/tau2 (a 'potential vortex' of the electric field), and the resulting fundamental field equation 5.7 contains Maxwell's theory as the special case tau2 -> infinity.
• The Schroedinger and Klein-Gordon equations can be derived from the fundamental field equation under the equilibrium condition tau1 = tau2.
• Particle masses follow from vortex shell models: the proton is nine times the muon (measured 8.88), the muon is 204 m_e, and a table of mesons and hyperons is reproduced.
• Scalar waves (grad div E) are longitudinal waves of variable speed, are what antenna noise is, and include Tesla radiation and neutrino radiation, which are faster than light.
• The longitudinal wave speed has a stability limit at the golden ratio, v = 1.618 c, and an antenna length rule lambda_vortex = 1.618 lambda.
• The fields determine all lengths (E, H ~ 1/l^2) and the speed of light, so c is a measurement constant and gravitation is electromagnetic (closed field lines).
• The Earth grows exponentially by neutrino absorption in its core (6.5 cm/yr in diameter today, 9.15e16 kg/yr), and the ocean water 200 Myr ago covered a Pangaea-only sphere.
• Space-energy devices (Tesla converter, railgun, magnetic converters, Patterson cell) collect neutrino radiation and show over-unity efficiencies of several hundred to thousands of percent.
• The 11 August 1999 eclipse acted as a lens focusing solar neutrinos on the Earth's core with 27-68 times the normal flux.
• Scalar waves carry biological information and nerve conduction uses longitudinal standing waves (nodes of Ranvier).
• In a 1990 test at the FH Furtwangen HF laboratory a silver-coated ceramic capacitor package gave Q = 48 against 28 (silver polished off) and 9 (silver acid-stripped); on repetition the difference 'drowned in the mean variation' (book pp.410-412).
• On 14.06.1997 an 'electrosensitive' woman is said to have identified grounded against ungrounded receiver 100 % of the time after a training round, in a single-blind-at-best seminar test with undisclosed trial counts and 'different success' on repeats (p.418).
• A December 1999 oscilloscope record (6.7 MHz, 233 mW, 223 mW idle, 49.1 mW out) is read by Meyl as 490 % efficiency; the same record gives 21 % gross efficiency and a power factor of 0.055 at the transmitter (pp.419-422).
• Forecasts: rotation slowing after 29.3.2006 and earthquakes near Crete and Asia Minor about 4.4.2006; 'no good' from 13.11.2012; South Carolina (Columbia) on 21.8.2017 (book pp.446-448).
• Meyl states that in three cases he had to tell inventors their device was an 'energy destroying machine' and that they had measured wrong (p.346).

Relevance: The main source for the whole project: every central claim is stated here, often with equations and numbers, and each can be traced to a chapter. Its internal inconsistencies and errors (day-length algebra, Hafele-Keating sign, golden-ratio derivation, the Moon factor) matter for the arbiter.

Mainstream conflict: Disagrees with Maxwell (div B = 0), special and general relativity, quantum mechanics (derivation of Schroedinger from classical fields), the standard model (no strong or weak interaction), plate tectonics and geodesy, solar neutrino physics and energy conservation. Deep readers record where the stated numbers do not match measured values ([memory]-tagged, to be web-verified by the reviewers). Digest-only chapters carry the author's claims without checks. Eclipse-earthquake links and the rotation 'acceleration' are not supported by the USGS and IERS records examined (see summary); Meyl's lens mechanism is refraction of slow neutrinos, not gravitational lensing.

The summary of the kit experiments that Meyl publishes in a refereed journal (the Journal of Scientific Exploration; how thoroughly a conference-based paper was refereed is unknown; the document says nothing). Abstract: five experiments 'incompatible with textbook physics'. Derivation (Figs 1-2): vector identity Delta E = grad div E - rot rot E; Maxwell supplies only rot rot (with j = 0), the 'grad div' term is asked about; with E = -grad phi: plasma wave Delta phi = (1/c^2) d^2 phi/dt^2 - rho/epsilon; Meyl then moves to vacuum with the potential vortex (no equations given, referred to the books). The deep reader's checks: the textbook equation already assumed div E = 0 so grad div E = 0 there; the final equation is the Lorenz-gauge potential equation driven by charge; a pure E = -grad phi cannot oscillate within Maxwell's equations. Experiments (all with the kit; the author sells it): E1 energy transfer at about 7 MHz with LED thresholds U > 2 V (receiver) and < 2 V (transmitter), distance not given; E2 pull the receiver's earth, transmitter LED relights; E3 'effectiveness between 500 and 1000%', after coil swap 1000%, 'about 10', and less than 10% from the near-field transmitter / 90% not; E4 7 MHz versus about 4.7 MHz, 7/4.7 = 1.49, 'wavelength not changed', 1.5 c; E5 transmitter in the aluminium case, 'expert EMC laboratories cannot detect anything' yet the receiver lamps glow, rotating the coil shows electric coupling, so tunnelling. Tesla's 12 Hz earth resonance against Schumann 7.8 Hz gives 1.5 c (the deep reader points out that Schumann resonance was predicted in 1952, so Tesla could not have compared, and that the quoted patent US 787,412 does not obviously contain 12 Hz). 'Some universities can already confirm the effects' (unnamed); 50 kits sold in four weeks. Controls described: coil swap, receiver-earth removal, second frequency, coil rotation; not described: input/output power method, dummy load, shield attenuation, wiring through the shield, time of flight. Other statements: vortices stable above 1.6 c (the measured value is 1.5), neutrino radiation as the source, Kelvin's remark (single source).

Key claims

• Five kit experiments show energy transfer, receiver-to-transmitter feedback, over-unity of about 10, scalar waves at 1.5 times the speed of light, and an ineffective Faraday cage.
• The scalar part of the wave equation, grad div E, describes plasma-like longitudinal electric waves that exist even in vacuum via potential vortices.
• The effectiveness of the kit is between 500% and 1000% (1000% after exchanging the coils).
• With the transmitter in a closed aluminium case the receiver lamps still glow, although EMC laboratories measure no field.
• Tesla's earth resonance of 12 Hz compared with the Schumann 7.8 Hz shows his wave went at 1.5 c.
• Some universities have already confirmed the effects.

Relevance: The peer-reviewed-venue statement of the kit claims (to be weighed against the IGF test and the manual); lists exactly which numbers have no method behind them.

Mainstream conflict: Over-unity, cage penetration and 1.5 c conflict with energy conservation, shielding and relativity; the derivation conflicts with Gauss's law in charge-free space. Deep reader: a resonant step-up of voltage between two tuned coils is not an energy gain; the same-wavelength assumption between two resonance modes is not shown.

A nine-question interview in the journal CoMed (01/03) in which Meyl responds to a critical questioner (Groesser had earlier contacted Meyl's opponents; his part 1 is not in the file). The editorial lead-in claims the list of supporters 'is longer by orders of magnitude' and that the nodes of Ranvier prove longitudinal standing waves in nerve conduction (CoMed 06/01); no list is given. Meyl's answers: (Q1) his own university (FH Furtwangen) is open to him, only colleague Kuehlke engages in 'bad polemic'; he never answers on forums; the set is sold as long as there is demand; (Q2) the IGF test report is dismissed ('a questionable private institute... only conventional measurements, everything unconventional dismissed as harmonics without measuring'); 'hundreds of measurements at far more serious institutes' reproduced the unusual properties (none named); his calculations were re-done by 'well-known mathematics professors' (none named); the only contrary opinion known to him, from TU Darmstadt, is by 'a fraud posing as a mathematics professor' (alias 'Gullible') and a retiree 'Bruhn', which Darmstadt has distanced itself from after vector-analysis rules were 'openly' violated (his account only; no document); (Q3) he gives no Belgrade source study, only his own 'successful replication' of Tesla and an invitation to buy a set; (Q4) sound, plasma waves and neutrino radiation are all scalar waves; (Q5) he will not name instrument makers he negotiates with; (Q6) he is invited by an unnamed technical university, teaches 'Neutrinopower' at TU Berlin, and most kits are bought by universities that pass the case on (a German university bought three; East European universities reportedly pass one from Warsaw to Riga to St. Petersburg to Moscow 'as I have learned'); (Q7) the set is 'a historical reconstruction after Tesla's plans', students modulate a scalar receiver with music and hear it at the transmitter, receivers with no external supply; a public demonstration is announced for 14 March 2003; (Q8) a JSE article (2001) and mainly books, no mention of rejections; (Q9) scalar waves are longitudinal along E or H, so 'electric' or 'magnetic' scalar waves exist, never 'electromagnetic' ones. The deep reader notes that neither Maxwell nor Ranvier nodes are discussed in the Q&A, and that the debate on content with critics is mostly personal; no numbers, frequencies, protocols or controls are given in any answer. Stake: Meyl sells the set and books; the questioner's side is described only by Meyl.

Key claims

• The IGF test of the kit is invalid because it made only conventional measurements and dismissed unconventional effects as harmonics without measuring them.
• Hundreds of measurements at more serious institutes reproduced the unusual scalar-wave properties of the set.
• Meyl's calculations have been re-checked by well-known mathematics professors and no inadequacy has been demonstrated.
• Most of the experiment cases sold are bought by universities and passed between institutes.
• Students have modulated a scalar-wave receiver with music and heard it at the transmitter or a second receiver, with receivers running without external power supply.
• Scalar waves are longitudinal along an E or H field pointer, so only 'electric' or 'magnetic' scalar waves exist, never 'electromagnetic'.

Relevance: Meyl's own response to critics and the only place where he answers the IGF report and the Darmstadt critique; also the pointer to documents the Investigator should find (IGF Meyl1 page, Darmstadt critique by 'Gullible', Hoenl and Kuehlke pages, CoMed 06/01 on Ranvier, TU Berlin course).

Mainstream conflict: Not a physics paper. The statements about independent confirmation and mathematical re-checks are uncorroborated assertions in a single interview with an interested party (kit seller, author); they are reported as Meyl's characterisation. Whether TU Darmstadt distanced itself is Meyl's statement only.

A medical-audience lecture that repeats the kit experiments and extends them to biology. Opening: biology solves energy and information tasks differently from technology (migratory birds losing no weight, fish, photosynthesis), suggesting energy from the environment such as neutrino radiation. Nerve conduction: Meyl argues there is no current return and no antenna, so a longitudinal wave with wavelength fitted to the nerve is proposed, the myelin sheath as a Tesla coil, nodes of Ranvier as nodes of a standing wave (Kundt's dust figures); nerve with 1 mm node spacing (lambda/2) and 120 m/s gives 60 kHz. The kit (20 MHz sine generator in a suitcase, 'sold to interested parties', 'over 50 universities worldwide... have measured it' from Edinburgh to Vienna, Stanford and TU Peking) is used to go through Tesla's statements: experiment 1 lamps light at about ten times the near-field range; experiment 2 earth disconnection; experiment 3 efficiency 'up to 500 percent' depending on setup, surroundings, earth connection, time of day 'and even the resonance of observers'; experiment 4 Schumann 7.8 Hz versus Tesla 12 Hz, 7/4.6 = 1.5. Scalar-wave medicine: biophotons (Popp), hollow conduits in the intercellular matrix (Heine, 20-300 nm wavelengths, if propagation is six powers of ten slower the frequency falls into the microwave window), a 'microwave window' with Sun and planets at 2-20 cm wavelengths; mobile phones: D-network 32 cm wavelength, converted with sound speed to 1 and 2 kHz, so tinnitus is attributed to mobile telephony and the band from 2 cm (16 kHz) to 3 m (100 Hz) should be kept free; cancer as 'energy-deficiency disease' (mitochondria catch neutrinos; oxygen binds free radicals; oxygen deficit damages mitochondrial DNA); homeopathy, bioresonance, frequency therapy, zapper, and a call for 'potential-vortex medicine'. Reference list includes von Buttlar interview, Tesla Said, Popp, Heine, Koehler, Clark. No trial or measurement of the medical claims is reported. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Deep read: no trial, patient data, measurement series or publication is offered for nerve conduction, tinnitus or cancer. The nerve number is derived (node spacing 1 mm = lambda/2, speed 120 m/s, so 60 kHz); the tinnitus step uses sound speed (about 10^6 below c) to map the 32 cm D-network wavelength to 1 kHz. Cancer is described as an energy deficiency from mitochondria that capture neutrinos, 'in meinen Augen'. For the kit, 'ueber 50 Universitaeten ... von Edinbourg bis Wien und von der Stanford University bis zur TU Peking' are said to measure it; exactly four places are named and no result, report or researcher is given [p.3]. Efficiency: 'bis zu 500 Prozent' depending on set-up, measuring environment, earthing, 'Tageszeit und sogar von der Resonanzfaehigkeit der Zuschauer', 'In Einzelfaellen ... mehr als das fuenffache' [p.5]. Meyl's caveats: terrestrial fields may also be tapped [p.5], the cosmic-source objection for tinnitus is 'berechtigt' [p.8], bioresonance may leave patients 'schlechter' [p.12], frequency therapy 'darf ... eigentlich gar nicht funktionieren' [p.12], the zapper is 'der Schuss mit der Schrotflinte in den Wald' [p.13]. Meyl sells the kit and the books (stake). The kit demonstration states that grounding the receiver is indispensable and that disconnecting it extinguishes the receiver lamps and relights the transmitter lamps [p.4].

Key claims

• Over 50 universities worldwide have measured the effects of the kit (Edinburgh, Vienna, Stanford, TU Peking named as a range).
• The kit's efficiency reaches up to 500 percent, depending on setup, surroundings, earth connection, time of day and even the resonance of observers.
• Nerve conduction uses longitudinal electric standing waves, with nodes of Ranvier as the nodes (60 kHz for 1 mm spacing and 120 m/s).
• Mobile phone frequencies converted with the speed of sound fall at 1-2 kHz and cause modern tinnitus.
• Cancer is an energy-deficiency disease: mitochondria catch neutrinos, and an oxygen shortage lets free radicals damage mitochondrial DNA.
• Frequency therapy and the zapper destroy parasites because the scalar part of the signal tunnels to their resonance.
• Over 50 universities, with Edinburgh, Vienna, Stanford and TU Beijing named, are said to measure the kit; no result from any of them is given (p.3).

Relevance: The densest statement of the biological and health claims and of the unreferenced 'over 50 universities' count; the tinnitus conversion shows the scalar-speed reinterpretation applied to health.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with neurophysiology (saltatory conduction of action potentials in myelinated axons), tinnitus aetiology, oncology and EMC consensus; the 'frequency from sound speed' conversion for microwaves is the author's premise. Deep reader's note on a related lecture says unnamed university confirmations are uncorroborated assertions. Not weighed here (digest only).

The deep reader's headline: this paper contains no equations (only 'v = lambda*f' on an axis, 'Id = 0' and '20c') and no neutrino-oscillation or neutrino-mass results; the title's 'modern neutrino research' is not backed by a citation of neutrino physics. The argument is verbal: galaxy rotation and Kepler's laws (Voyager citation via a Time-Life book; Pluto's period of 90,465 days is Kepler-consistent per the deep reader, [memory] high); the four known interactions are eliminated for galaxies; Kelvin travelled to New York to see Tesla's experiments and proposed a ring vortex; Tesla 'and no one else' discovered neutrino radiation (penetrates the Earth; solar radiations detected at night) and built 'neutrino transmitters' 60 years before 1956; Tesla's patent US 787,412 (1905) is said to give 471,240 km/s (1.572 c; the number is not quoted from the patent text); tunnelling at Cologne, Berkeley, TU Wien at 2-5 c (Chiao 1993, Enders and Nimtz 1993); longitudinal waves slower than light (sound), at light speed (photons, 'vortices'), faster (neutrinos); the antenna standing wave is a fixed vortex; wave-to-vortex conversion costs no energy. Core model (the body labels it 'Modellvorstellung'; abstract and summary say 'derived'): a ring vortex turns itself inside out, shows alternately as electron and positron, so on average carries neither charge nor mass, 'exactly the known properties of a neutrino'; instruments are 'too slow' to see it. Resonance rule: identical frequency and opposite phase between sender, neutrino and receiver; DC/AC analogy with 'Id = 0' mean and RMS values: oscillating charge is a 'resonant interaction', oscillating mass 'levitation'. Consequences: galaxies held by oscillating charge; black holes and supernovae as neutrino transmitters; Sun radiating 5 million t/s (matches L/c^2 = 4.3 million t/s, [memory] high) yet growing; Earth a 'neutrino reactor' with 'Erdstrahlung' (geomancy, radiesthesia, astrology); neutron decay triggered by passing neutrinos; an atomic clock in an aircraft (1975) read as neutrino-triggered decay; proposed 'neutrino shower' for clocks; shortening half-lives of radioactive waste; Wilhelm Reich and 'Patterson cells' (hearsay: 'wie uns berichtet wird'). Meyl directs the 1. TZS and sells his books (stake). The deep reader flags that Tesla's >100% efficiency, solar radiations at night and similar statements are Meyl's characterisation of Tesla without citation other than the 1905 patent and a Cheney biography, and that the paper never mentions flavour oscillation.

Key claims

• Tesla's 'Radiations' are neutrino radiation, discovered by Tesla about 60 years before 1956.
• A neutrino is a ring vortex oscillating between electron and positron states, with zero time-averaged charge and mass.
• Tesla's 1905 patent gives a longitudinal signal speed of 471,240 km/s, i.e. 1.57 times the speed of light.
• Oscillating (resonant) charge, not gravity, holds the outer stars of galaxies, because Kepler's laws fail beyond Saturn and in galaxies.
• Neutrino beams could shorten the half-lives of radioactive waste, making Castor transports and storage unnecessary.
• An atomic clock in an aircraft ran differently (1975) because a fast, length-contracted clock is closer to passing neutrinos which trigger decay.

Relevance: Source of the neutrino identification (the bridge from Tesla radiation to Neutrinopower) and of the 'oscillating charge and mass' model; also the record that this paper cites no neutrino-physics data.

Mainstream conflict: Neutrinos are neutral leptons with nonzero mass (Super-Kamiokande 1998, SNO 2001-02) and are not observed superluminal (OPERA 2011 anomaly withdrawn), per the deep reader's [memory] notes; the paper's 'zero mean mass' conflicts with oscillation-implied mass and is not addressed. Left to the physicist.

A transcribed lecture with live demonstration, given about a year after an earlier talk (demonstrations in November 1999 and February 2000 at the Technologiepark Villingen-Schwenningen; over 100 people attended the first, specialists the second). The kit costs 1,100 DM; it contains all material and a function generator to 15 MHz; the case doubles as a cage; 'for the experiment you can always get a declaration of conformity and the CE mark'; its intended use includes making scalar waves 'plausible in court in an electrosmog suit about directional radio antennas'. Set-up: identical pancake coils with sphere electrodes, earthed at one end, LEDs with about 2 V threshold, power 'one tenth to one half of a watt'; no frequency, voltage, distance, ball size or coil data. Four experiments: energy arrives only in resonance (lamp at the receiver lights); the dark transmitter lamp while the receiver glows (back-reaction: 'the transmitter knows whether the receiver is connected'); 'free energy' read from LEDs ('measurement errors are excluded'); the Faraday cage ('the scalar-wave signal tunnels between the wire mesh'; an EMC lab 'examined and confirmed' the shielding, lab, report and date not named). Efficiency: 'up to 500 percent in Villingen... at TU Clausthal neutral measurement specialists measured even 1000 percent' with no method, instruments or names. Theory frame as in the other lectures (rot rot = Hertz, grad div = Tesla; velocity classes; near field longitudinal; ground wave tunnels through the Earth; 90% antenna efficiency means 10% scalar wave: 'what I cannot detect as a broadcast wave and is not heat must be scalar wave'). Meyl says scalar waves cannot be measured at present, and that the cage result needs no instrument because the lamp is the indicator. Further statements: scalar waves cause 'electrosmog' and 'radio operator disease'; a mobile phone would need only 3 microwatt (future music); a magnetic 'Magnetkonverter' is superior as a collector but not demonstrated; cable-TV leakage into aircraft band; Heine hyperboloid channels; Tesla model boat patent 1898; Einstein's 1921 Nobel prize and Heisenberg's 'equals sign'. Safety advice: reduce the generator until the receiver loses power; never operate a sender without a receiver. The deep reader's observation: the lamp pattern depends on loading and tuning of identical resonant coils; no input-power measurement besides the LEDs; the cage depends on how the cage, ground and generator lead are connected, only partly described. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Stakes and confirmations stated in this lecture (digest pp.14-15, cited by QE): an unnamed EMC laboratory is said to have 'checked and confirmed' the cage test, with a conformity declaration and CE mark available; telecom firms bought Meyl's books but declined funding; his work runs on donations and volunteers.

Key claims

• The receiver lamp lights only at resonance, so the energy arrives only in resonance.
• The transmitter lamp goes out while the receiver lamp glows, so the receiver pulls power from the transmitter and the transmitter 'knows' it is connected.
• The efficiency measured was up to 500 percent in Villingen and 1000 percent at TU Clausthal.
• A Faraday cage with a mesh small relative to the wavelength does not shield the scalar-wave signal, as an EMC laboratory has confirmed.
• Whatever an antenna radiates that is neither a broadcast wave nor heat must be scalar wave.
• With resonant reception a mobile phone would need only a few microwatt instead of 3 W.

Relevance: A third kit description (lecture style) with the same claims and the same lack of data; carries the commercial context (price, CE mark, courtroom use).

Mainstream conflict: Same as the other kit documents: over-unity, cage penetration and distance independence conflict with energy conservation and EMC shielding; the document gives no data to test them. The CE and EMC-lab statements are uncorroborated (lab, report and date not named).

A three-page summary in an OMICS International open-access journal (page 3 carries the publisher's advertisement 'Rapid review process'; the deep reader notes from memory that OMICS lost an FTC case in 2019 over deceptive claims, including peer review; that is the regulator's characterisation and bears on refereeing, not physics). It continues Meyl's PIERS papers 2012 and 2013. Calculation: the damped field equation c^2 Delta E = d^2E/dt^2 + (1/tau) dE/dt (eq. 1; the printed equation carries the stray expression 'v/c = (1+sqrt5)/2 = 1.618'), a vortex model with tau = r/c, an ansatz E = E(t) exp(-x/r), and the chain rule dE/dt = v dE/dx give c^2 = v^2 - v c (eq. 5), v = c/2 +/- sqrt(c^2/4 + c^2), v/c = 1.618 (eq. 6) and c/v = 0.618 'the Golden Proportion'. Table 1: v = c vortices decay within lambda/(2 pi) (near field); v < 1.618 c noise; v = 1.618 c stability limit; v > 1.618 c no decay, 'neutrino radiation'. Antenna rule: lambda_vortex = 1.618 lambda_wave = 1.618 c/f. The abstract claims 'the near field zone is enlarging, if the longitudinal parts of a wave or the antenna voltage are accelerated... could be tested experimentally... demonstrated more often... both the speed of propagation and the near field are enlarging proportional to each other', and 'an extended version of the Laplace equation is derived'. The paper itself has no frequency, power, efficiency, range, antenna size, date, place or witness; no proportionality between speed and near-field size is derived; the title says far to near while the abstract's last sentence says near to far. Deep reader's maths checks: the algebra (2)-(6) and the units are correct; the damping term with sigma = 0 is Meyl's postulate; Meyl's derivatives belong to a profile E0 exp(-(x + v t)/r) that moves in the minus-x direction, and an outward profile gives v^2 + v c - c^2 = 0, so v = 0.618 c; the golden ratio comes only from the assumption tau = r/c (general: v = r/(2 tau) + sqrt(r^2/(4 tau^2) + c^2)); a non-oscillating exponential carries no signal; the radius r cancels so no near-field size results; one-dimensional Laplacian and div E = 0 contradict a longitudinal E(x). The textbook near field boundary lambda/(2 pi) is where reactive and radiated terms of the Hertzian dipole are equal.

Key claims

• The near-field zone of an antenna enlarges, and the near field reaches to infinity at a longitudinal propagation speed of v = 1.618 c.
• A damped field equation with vortex damping tau = r/c and an exponential trial solution gives v^2 - v c - c^2 = 0, so v/c = (1 + sqrt 5)/2.
• Scalar-wave antennas are most effective at a vortex wavelength of 1.618 times the wave wavelength (the Golden Proportion).
• Field vortices faster than 1.618 c are stable and are properly called neutrinos.
• In an experiment shown 'more often', changing the antenna design raised the speed of propagation and the near field proportionally.

Relevance: The 2016 form of the golden-ratio (1.618 c) result and the 'extended near field' claim; also the place where Meyl cites an experiment with no data, pointing to PIERS 2012/2013 and his books.

Mainstream conflict: Contradicts the textbook dipole near field (reactive terms fall off faster than the radiation term beyond lambda/(2 pi); they do not 'decay' as vortices) and the signal speed c of the telegraph equation. Deep reader: the superluminal reading depends on the sign of the chain-rule step and on a postulated tau = r/c.

An issue of the newsletter of an association for research on mobile-communication fields. It contains: a University of Stuttgart study on pacemaker interference by far- and near-field exposure at 50-500 MHz (worst-case coupled voltage nearly 30 V peak-to-peak open-circuit at short distance, device dependent); an article (Gollnick and Conrad, Physiologisches Institut Bonn) on 'Geldrollenbildung' (rouleaux, red blood cells stacked like coins) used in citizens' meetings against mobile base stations (live demonstration in the Eifel, Kall, reported in the Koelner Stadt-Anzeiger 15./16.1.2000): rouleaux are known to depend on plasma proteins, flow and cells; over 200 papers exist but no scientific study on weak RF fields; the authors' own phase-contrast tests found rouleaux regardless of test conditions, patterns changing during observation, no effect of a phone call in any case, and the strongest rouleaux in a person who never used a mobile phone; a description of the planned international case-control study on mobile phones and brain tumours (about 6000 cases, 13 countries, German centres Bielefeld, Heidelberg, Mainz; earlier Swedish and US studies found no raised risk but were small and short); an interview with SSK chair Prof. M. Blettner; the FGF annual assembly (set up in September 1992 by the economics ministry; members include broadcasters, network operators, manufacturers; budget about 2.3 million DM); a UMTS/CDMA primer; a stress-protein article; DECT cordless phone news (Oekotest versus Computer-Bild and ICNIRP); notices. No mention of Meyl or scalar waves. The publisher is an industry-supported research association (members include network operators and manufacturers; interested party for the question of mobile-phone health effects). Relevance for Meyl: the blood 'roll' phenomenon appears in the 2012 Ashdin paper as 'Scheller's test procedure' with mobile phones and in the Neutrino Power themes; this issue documents the same demonstration in January 2000 and its rejection by a physiology institute. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Deep read. Bonn rouleaux study (Gollnick and Conrad, Physiologisches Institut, p.5-7): in their own laboratory they repeated the 'Vitalblut-Diagnostik' demonstration (phase contrast instead of the dark field used by the demonstrator), 'bei einer Vielzahl von Testansaetzen', with and without a mobile-phone call and with a no-call control. Result: 'zahlreiche Geldrollenbildungen ... ganz unabhaengig von den Testbedingungen', each preparation looked different, areas with and without rouleaux on one slide, 'In keinem Fall konnte ein Hinweis auf einen Effekt durch ein gefuehrtes Handy-Telefonat gefunden werden', and the subject with the strongest rouleaux 'war noch nie Handy-Benutzer'. They call the demonstration unsuitable and non-reproducible. Limits stated in the text itself: no numbers of subjects or preparations, no blinding, call length or phone power, no statistics; studies of weak radio-frequency fields on rouleau formation 'fehlen bis heute'; the null result is for the non-standardised slide-viewing method, not for biological effects in general. Funding of the study is not stated. Publisher: the Forschungsgemeinschaft Funk e.V. (FGF), Bonn, founded in September 1992 through the federal post ministry; members include network operators, manufacturers, broadcasters, authorities and scientific institutions (minister's list); 1999 research spending 1.46 million DM; independence is asserted by the FGF and the sponsoring minister, and the FGF's own PR group records the accusation of lobbying (pp.13-14). The FGF is an interested party in mobile-phone health questions.

Key claims

• No scientific study of the effect of weak high-frequency fields on rouleaux formation in blood exists, and the blood-microscopy demonstration shown in the Eifel does not meet scientific criteria.
• In the Bonn tests no effect of a mobile-phone call on rouleaux appeared, and rouleaux occurred in many samples regardless of test conditions.
• The pacemaker interference voltage in the near field of a 50-500 MHz antenna can reach nearly 30 V peak-to-peak (open circuit), depending on antenna position and pacemaker type.
• The planned international case-control study (about 6000 brain-tumour cases) can assess brain-tumour risk of mobile phones but not all health risks.
• A Bonn physiology laboratory found rouleaux in many blood preparations independent of a mobile-phone call and judged the public vital-blood demonstration unsuitable (April 2000, FGF newsletter pp.5-7; interested publisher).

Relevance: Context only: documents the mainstream/industry-side response to the blood-rouleaux demonstration that Meyl cites; shows the information environment of the electrosmog debate in 2000. Not evidence for or against scalar waves.

Mainstream conflict: None with mainstream; it is a mainstream publication. The publisher's stake (industry-supported) should be noted when reading its assessment of health effects.

A promotional-style witness report on the demonstration of 'G-Com' technology at the IT- und Medientage, Landratsamt Bad Toelz, 27 Oct 2001, 16:30. Dr. rer. nat. Hartmut Mueller (IREF Wolfratshausen) claims voice transmission between Bad Toelz and St. Petersburg 'without transmitter and without progressive artificially generated carrier waves', using 'standing gravitational waves' and a 'Global-Scaling' theory, with 'gravi-electric energy converters (G-elements)' (steel cans with piezoelectric nano-crystals and a resonator, shown opened afterwards) and 'Bio-Guards'. Sequence: a call to St. Petersburg university was established by ordinary telephone line; Mueller pulled the plug from the telephone wall socket and the partner's voice continued 'without any interruption'; the article does not say what the audio path was afterwards, whether other devices were on the line, or who in St. Petersburg operated what. Stated numbers: power under 1 W, 'milliwatt range' ('a torch battery'), 2500 km, >50 attendees (the Landrat of Bad Toelz-Wolfratshausen visited the stand; his quoted praise concerns the exhibitors, not the experiment), a spectrum analyser 'monitors that no carrier is generated' (no trace shown), speech quality 'still relatively poor', video for EUR 20. No independent verification, no replication, no named outside expert. The article does not name Meyl (the deep reader found no mention in the four pages) and the physical mechanism (standing gravitational waves) differs from Meyl's scalar waves. The reporter's publisher (Ehlers Verlag, raum&zeit) is one of the four exhibitors, so the account is an interested party's. File is probably in the Meyl folder because of the 'Tesla principles' title or a neighbouring article.

Key claims

• Speech between Bad Toelz and St. Petersburg (about 2500 km) was transmitted without a transmitter or artificial carrier wave using G-elements resonating with standing gravitational waves.
• The power consumption of the whole arrangement is well below 1 W (milliwatt range).
• A spectrum analyser showed no carrier wave during the voice transmission.
• Standing gravitational waves set all particles of the universe into synchronous oscillation, so the connection is simultaneous.

Relevance: Indirect: a comparable 'no-carrier' communication claim from the same milieu and magazine; the folder placement does not establish any link to Meyl. Useful as an example of single-source, interested-party event reporting that the arbiter should not credit to Meyl's work.

Mainstream conflict: Standing gravitational waves as a communication carrier have no basis in mainstream physics; the article gives no measurement or recording that could test it. Not weighed here.

Essentially an English version of the 2003 colloquium talk; no new data, calculation or flux compared with 2003 (the deep reader found one addition: an Aristarchus year-length comparison, 365.25062 versus 365.25637 days, 497 s in 2300 years, 0.22 s/year, read as 'the Earth is currently growing faster than on average over the last 2300 years'; and one omission: the banded iron ores by 'Neutrinolysis'). Same angular-momentum model: circumference growth 45 cm/yr at constant mass ('clearly too much' against a maximum of 25 cm/yr), 18-19 cm/yr at constant density ('confirming'); 8e16 kg and '72e32 Nm' per year; Perrin 2002 diameter growth 7.79 or 7.94 cm/yr, whose circumference equivalent is 24.5 or 24.9 cm/yr (the English prints '24.09', a typo of the German '24,9'). The abstract says the neutrino absorption 'has been measured at the Kamiokande detector from the difference between day and nighttime'. Neutrino model as before (oscillating e-/e+, zero mean and non-zero RMS values, superluminal; 66 versus 3 billion /s cm^2 read as 96%/4%; half of solar neutrinos missing at night; dark matter; resonant 'neutrino strings'; neutrino-fed Sun may become a red giant). Interior: gas outer core, plasma inner core, atoms collapsing to neutrons and beta decay n + nu -> p + e, 0 K and superconduction. Deep reader's findings: no energy or mass balance with real neutrino fluxes is attempted; with the paper's own flux (66e9 /s cm^2), Earth's cross-section and 1 MeV per neutrino, total absorption would give about 1.3e16 W, i.e. about 4e23 J per year against the 7.2e33 J/yr requirement (a factor of order 10^10; the requirement is about 2.3e26 W, 60% of the Sun's luminosity); the 1 km^3/yr juvenile water is only about 1e-5 of the 8e16 kg/yr; no water-coverage percentage is claimed in the article; 4 of 19 references are Meyl's own; no primary neutrino paper is cited (Super-Kamiokande, SNO, Gallex); Perrin 2002 (NCGT proceedings) is the only quantitative geodetic source and NASA data reach the article only through it; Moray 1960 is cited for a 1930s finding. Time base of eqs. (2)-(3) (dt/t = 2.3e-8 as an annual change or an accumulated offset) is not explicit. QE remediation additions (2026-10-08): Digest inputs recorded by the QE agent: the same Kamiokande/Gallex ratio read as a 4 %/96 % charge split [digest p.2], and Aristarchus's year of 365.25062 days used to derive '0.22 s/a' [digest pp.3-4]. Neither is checked against the sources by this agent beyond the digest.

Key claims

• The Earth's circumference grows by 18-19 cm per year at constant density, consistent with a day lengthening of 0.71-0.73 s per year.
• The Earth must collect 8e16 kg (7.2e33 J) of matter per year, supplied by neutrino absorption in its core.
• Neutrino absorption has been measured at the Kamiokande detector from the difference between day and night counts.
• Earth, Sun, planets and stars grow by neutrino absorption, and the Sun may become a red giant.
• The Earth is currently growing faster than the average over the last 2300 years, from an Aristarchus year-length comparison (0.22 s/year).
• The Earth's inner core is at 0 K and superconducting, and neutrons there decay by n + nu -> p + e.

Relevance: The latest published (2015) statement of the Earth-expansion claim, with its energy figure and no flux balance; it shows the claim was not developed numerically in 12 years.

Mainstream conflict: Conflicts with plate tectonics, space-geodetic limits on any radius change, iron-core seismology, neutrino cross-sections and energy conservation. Deep reader's checks: the mass-energy requirement exceeds the neutrino energy supply by about 10 orders of magnitude; the day-length increase used is about 100 times the measured long-term rate ([memory] medium).