2026-10-08 Wayback Machine: gravitation.org (IGF Waldaschaff) Meyl pages (STEP I)
CDX query: url=gravitation.org/Meyl* gave captures of meyl1.html and meyl2.html (29 Jan and 8 Feb 2002, status 200; "Meyl2.html" with a capital M 404 in May 2002, 302 later). Fetched https://web.archive.org/web/20020208id_/http://www.gravitation.org:80/meyl1.html and .../meyl2.html (saved pages/wayback-gravitation-meyl1.html, -meyl2.html; meyl2 copied to research/files/IGF-gravitation.org-meyl2-2001-Analyse-eines-Teslaschwingkreises.html).
Found [web]
- meyl1.html = the IGF report already in the folder ("Experimente zum Nachweis von Skalarwellen", Junker, Schmelzer, Senkel, Weidner, Winkels, Zentgraf, Sept 2001; page "Last Update 12 Jul 2001").
- meyl2.html = the IGF follow-up report that claims.md lists as missing: "Analyse eines Teslaschwingkreises oder Was ist dran an Skalarwellen?", signed "Verfasser: Herbert Weidner ... 10.8.2001"; thanks the Göde-Wissenschaftsstiftung / IGF for the kit, all instruments and the shielded measuring chamber. Instruments: Tektronix TDS 3054 (battery powered), HP 8594EM spectrum analyser.
- Kit details measured: the 'middle' board coil has 47 turns, 121 mm outer diameter, 5-turn coupling coil underneath; wire length (902 +/- 7) cm; L = 105 (stated "mH", at 100 kHz; for 47 turns of this size microhenries is the plausible unit, so "mH" is a typo for µH: his own Q = 2 pi x 7 MHz x L / 13.1 ohm = 353 holds only for L = 105 µH), R = 13.1 ohm; spheres 95 mm metallised plastic, 27 cm above the board; other boards 23 and 87 turns.
- Findings, in the report's words or close paraphrase: at 6 MHz the emission spectrum shows "einen überraschend starken Anteil an Oberwellen über 20 MHz"; the LEDs clip the oscillator at +/-1.7 V and generate odd harmonics; the Tesla circuit behaves like a capacitively shortened Lecher line whose resonances are not integer multiples, so a harmonic can resonate when the fundamental does not; "Das hat nichts mit 'Over-Unity-Effekten' ... zu tun". The 'Rückwirkung' test: at 7.2 MHz the sender LEDs go out and the receiver LEDs light; a hand 1 cm from the sender sphere swaps them; at the sender coupling coil the 3rd harmonic 21.6 MHz is 15 dB stronger than 7.2 MHz because the total 18.8 m of wire with the sphere capacitances resonates at 21.6 MHz and loads the oscillator below 1.7 V.
- Coil loss: P_loss = R I_eff^2 = 13.1 ohm x (3.4 mA)^2 = 0.15 mW against 19 mW from the oscillator, i.e. 0.8% lost per coil, "Die LUFTTRANSFORMATOREN haben also tatsächlich Wirkungsgrade von etwa 99%" (my check: 13.1 x 0.0034^2 = 0.151 mW). Q estimate 353 (with skin effect about 80). This contradicts Meyl's estimate that the coils have efficiency "deutlich unter 50%" and that the circuit behaves "zu 98% unkonventionell".
- Verdict section ("Bewertung der Skalarwellentheorie"): the documentation lacks "nachprüfbare numerische Ergebnisse und jegliche Fehlerbetrachtung"; the supplied oscillator is poor; "Verwendet man einen oberwellenarmen Oszillator und Standardinstrumente ... so existieren - bei ausgelöteten LED - die von Meyl beschriebenen Effekte überhaupt nicht mehr." The authors invite Meyl to inspect their apparatus and repeat the tests at the IGF. Further sections listed: earthing, "Fehlende Senderkugel", "Das Abstandsquadrat", "Hin- und Rückleitung", "'Nachweis' freier Energie", "Überlichtgeschwindigkeit".
- Literature: Meyl, Skalarwellentechnik und Dokumentation (INDEL 2000, 1st ed., ISBN 3-9802542-6-7) pp.7, 9, 11, 16; Meyl, "Skalarwellen-Übertragung", NET-Journal Dec 2000, vol. 5 no. 12, p.31.
Bearing
Claim 4 directly (the deciding independent test record). It fills the gap named in claims.md ("IGF follow-up report ... gravitation.org/Meyl2.html"). It adds a with-LEDs-removed control that the first report lacked, and a quantitative coil-loss figure. Gaps still open: no cage measurement, no wire-removed control; the 45% figure in report 1 (eye-matched LED brightness, whole link) and the 99% here (single coil copper loss) are different quantities and should not be compared directly. Interested parties: the IGF/Göde foundation had no commercial stake known; Meyl called it a "questionable private institute" (CoMed 01/03).