Dollard-Eric · Source catalogue
Every document in the project folder (9), as catalogued by the fact-finder (facts.json). Click a column heading to sort. The documents themselves are not published here.
| Type | Year | Title | How read | Text |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| article | 1986 | Understanding the Rotating Magnetic Field (JBR Mar-Apr 1986) with compilation cover Eric P. Dollard SummaryPreface-style article: says electrical science went dormant after Steinmetz, Tesla and Heaviside because of vested interests (the 'Edison Effect'), and that Steinmetz was hired by GE to decipher Tesla's patents. Then explains induction (EMF from a moving bar magnet, counter-EMF under load), the 'virtual pole' of a two-phase rotating magnetic field that a field magnet locks onto, and apparatus Figs 1-3 in which mechanical force is applied along the shaft axis. Mostly standard two-phase machine theory in Dollard's vocabulary; rotating field called 'Caduceus coil, spinning wave, double helix, solar cross'. Figure pages (pp.21-23) have garbled OCR. Step 0 OCR text (tesseract, all 29 pages) exists for this scan; OCR is noisy (e.g. the symbol pi is lost, so pi/2 reads as '/2' or '7?/2'). Key claims
Relevance: Peripheral; sets the Tesla/Steinmetz reading list for the rest of the compilation. Mainstream conflict: Rotating-field mechanics: none. The 'vested interests' claim is historical opinion with no evidence offered. | digest (OCR text, pp.1, 20-25); earlier Step 1 page images covered 27/29 pages of the scan but not pp.23 and 25 | yes |
| article | 1987 | Functional Thinking: An Interview with Eric Dollard (JBR Mar-Apr 1987, journal pp.19-29) Tom Brown interviewing Eric P. Dollard SummaryWide-ranging interview. Brown (Dollard's publisher) reports personally witnessing wireless propagation, several-inch sparks from insulators and odd forms in gas bulbs, which is the only 'evidence'. The interview has no measurements, diagrams or equations. Testable assertions found by the deep read (page in brackets): Farnsworth's multipactor, a secondary-emission negative-resistance tube that 'tends to take off' on a Tesla coil, is 'probably the only real free energy device that anyone ever demonstrated which can be reproduced' [p.2]; the dielectric side of electricity is 'the faster than light phenomenon' [p.3]; Tesla's terminal puts out 'a dielectric current of many amperes flowing through free space without any electrons' [p.4]; Tesla-coil discharges follow golden-ratio log spirals [p.4]; a four-year Sonoma State University project found weather 'very tightly coupled' to solar-flare cycles, with rain rising after solar cycle 21 flares fell [pp.5-6]; geomagnetic reversal would turn Earth from a 'magnetic' into a 'dielectric' regime needing ceramic compasses [p.6]; 'the velocity of light continually changes which changes the capacity of all capacitors and changes the effect of orgone' [p.7]; the orgone accumulator's dielectric layers slow light and metal layers reflect the EM part while the dielectric part passes through [p.7]; RCA used 90-degree planetary alignments ('radio astrology') for circuit predictions [p.8]; the 'planet hums at 60 cycles' and the national grid runs in phase [p.10]; sonar at 750,000 W harms whales [p.10]; dielectric waves are 'productive and advanced' and 'free energy will come from the dielectric field where energy grows rather than decays' [p.11]; every free-energy claimant is a fraud except one unnamed private worker [p.11]; nuclear plants barely break even [p.12]. About half the text is social commentary (psychotronic TV, food additives, 'techno-fascism'), listed so it is not mistaken for science. Internal tensions noted by the deep read: the multipactor is an electron device while his real free energy is current 'without electrons'; the accumulator is likened to a capacitor yet said to pass E-fields through metal. Key claims
Relevance: Only place in the folder with Dollard's positive free-energy claim (multipactor) and his statements on orgone, planets, weather and 'velocity of light changes'; also shows he is sceptical of much of his own community (ELF mind control, Woodpecker, claimants). Mainstream conflict: Strong for FTL dielectric waves, energy growth, variable c and ceramic compasses. 'Current without electrons' has a mainstream reading as displacement current. Multipactor oscillation is negative-resistance conversion of supply power (not net gain) [memory: medium, not web-checked]. RCA planetary work matches J.H. Nelson's 1940s-50s claims [memory: medium, not web-checked]; mainstream forecasting uses solar flux. Whole-US grid in phase is wrong as stated (several asynchronous interconnections) [memory: high]. | digest + deep read (pp.2-12, Sonnet, OCR text with page 3 checked against a page image) | yes |
| article | 1987 | The Transmission of Electricity, Part I (JBR Sep-Oct 1987, journal pp.4-7) Eric P. Dollard SummaryArgues energy transmission needs a closed circuit whose conductor boundary encloses space; energy is dissipated as heat in the conductor while the 'aetheric stress' outside is the electric field. Gives C = 1/c^2 as the 'capacitance' of the circuit in units with (4*pi*10^-9 p) factors, inductance L as an area l1*l2 in cm^2 (L = l0^2), natural period t0^2 = -LC and impedance Z0^2 = -L/C. Concludes conductors are 'electric obstructors' that reflect energy and insulators are the true conductors. The meaning of the factor 'p' and the unit conventions remain unresolved. Persistent currents in superconductors are called 'perpetual motion, an unlikely proposition' (p.16). Key claims
Relevance: Source of claim 1 (energy in the space, not the wire). The Poynting-vector picture is the mainstream version of this. Mainstream conflict: Energy flow in fields: mainstream (Poynting). 'Insulators are the true conductors' and C = 1/c^2 as stated need unit checking; negative signs in t0^2 = -LC use his symbolic (j-operator) convention [memory: medium]. | digest + earlier Step 1 page-image read; OCR text spot-checked by QE; the planned page-image transcription of the equations (QE deep read 3) was NOT done, so formulas below are as reported, not independently verified | yes |
| article | 1988 | The Transmission of Electricity, Part II (JBR May-Jun 1988, journal pp.10-12) Eric P. Dollard SummaryLooks at medium-frequency (300-3000 kc/s) broadcast: with widely spaced guide wires the electric field extends far beyond them and remote wire systems share fields by mutual induction. Energy lost in wide-spaced systems is large while the heat gained is disproportionately small, unlike close-spaced systems where loss is fully accountable as heat; he hedges that 'hysteresis of the aether' may not be the correct interpretation. Cites Tesla and Wheatstone for a propagation factor of pi/2 (1.57) times the speed of light (the digests wrongly give sqrt(2); the OCR shows 'pi lost' and 1.57 confirms pi/2). Ferrite-core antennas respond to magnetic induction only and are directional, capacity antennas respond to dielectric induction only and are non-directional, so neither works by 'electromagnetic induction' (p.19). Key claims
Relevance: Source of claims 2 and 4. Mainstream conflict: Strong: radiated power is accounted for by Poynting flux; a pi/2 c propagation speed conflicts with Maxwell's equations and measured wave speeds on transmission lines. | digest + earlier Step 1 page-image read; OCR text spot-checked by QE (p.18 quotations confirmed); equations not re-transcribed from page images | yes |
| article | 1990 | Introduction to Dielectricity and Capacitance (JBR Mar-Apr 1990, journal pp.10-13), as printed in the compilation Eric P. Dollard SummaryDuplicate of the standalone PDF; see that entry. Lines of force, stored field energy, infinite current on a short circuit, supercapacitance, mutual capacity to the universe, conjugate space. Key claims
Relevance: Same article as the standalone PDF. Mainstream conflict: See that entry. | digest (OCR text pp.26-29); the same article is covered in full from its own clean text layer in the separate Introduction-to-Dielectricity entry | yes |
| article | 1986-1990 (scan 2006) | Eric Dollard Notes 1986-1991 (colour scan of the same compilation) Eric P. Dollard SummaryDuplicate of the 2010 scan of the compilation, same page order and content; not separately summarised. See the entries for the 2010 scan. Key claims
Relevance: Redundant second scan; useful only for clearer figure pages. Mainstream conflict: Same as the 2010 scan. | digest (Step 0 OCR of all 29 pages, 2 chunks) + QE page-by-page OCR comparison with the 2010 scan: 24 of 29 pages score >=0.91 similarity; p.21 (0.30) and p.23 (0.17) are figure pages with garbled OCR; p.26 (0.82) and p.27 (0.69) were not checked one by one and are assumed OCR noise; earlier Step 1 also viewed pages 1 and 29 as images | yes |
| article | 1990 | Introduction to Dielectricity and Capacitance Eric P. Dollard Summary4-page web print (6 June 2019) of JBR Vol.46 No.2 pp.10-13. Dollard argues capacitance is dielectric field energy along Faraday-Steinmetz lines of force, not stored electrons: dielectric lines end on conductors, magnetic lines close on themselves; inductance stores energy outward (broadside) and in parallel, capacitance inward along the axis and in series. On a short circuit the dielectric field 'explodes' inward 'with a velocity that may exceed light' and current 'jumps to infinity', then a following line 'limits the rise of current to a realistic value'. LC exchange frequency is the inverse of the product of the storages, the ratio is the characteristic impedance (the 'pulsation'); high impedance with rapid change might compress energy into matter ('supercapacitance'); free-space capacitance of an object is its mutual capacity to all conductors in the universe; Steinmetz's infinite free-space inductance of a filament; 'conjugate space'. Also gives '250 KWH for lightning stroke' (about 0.9 GJ, unused by earlier steps; mainstream estimates run roughly 1-10 GJ per flash [memory: medium]). Cites J.J. Thomson, Steinmetz 1914 and 1920. Key claims
Relevance: Clearest statement of the dielectric/magnetic duality that underlies claims 2, 3 and 6. Mainstream conflict: Mixed: lines of force, LC resonance, Z=sqrt(L/C) and field energy are mainstream; FTL collapse, infinite current (an idealisation of zero resistance) and energy-to-matter conflict with relativity and circuit theory. | digest + full text layer read by Step 1; QE spot-checked quotations (lines 125, 165, 172, 178) against the extracted text | yes |
| other | unknown (only historical dates 1900, 1910, 1919 appear in text) | System for the Reception and Transmission of Telluric Waves (untitled typescript, claim-style) Eric P. Dollard (heading 'ERIC P. DOLLARD'; no date) Summary30-page scanned typescript with a poor OCR layer; no drawings, equations, tables, measurements or test data anywhere, only prose and numbered lists. Part Three (San Andreas seismic warning, Bolinas to Pacifica) appears in the contents but is absent: the text ends inside Part Two item (6)(h). No frequency, loading value, spacing or lead time is given. System: an antenna (space domain; loaded transmission-line aerials with many earth contacts), a network (time domain; conjugate low-pass and high-pass artificial lines acting as a transient 'discriminator'), and an amplifier (scalar domain; tunnel diode, multipactor, transistor, parametric). Receiving points arranged 'in quadrature groups of four' (body) or 'groups of 3 in Scott configuration' (footnote p.11; the Scott connection is a standard 2-phase/3-phase transformer connection, unexplained); plan position indicators (P.P.I.) show source location. Claimed: a single-wire (unipolar) earth connection, reciprocity not applicable (induction-machine slip analogy), the antenna cannot receive external EM waves (p.5) yet a rejection aerial loaded to propagate at exactly c is needed to cancel EM interference (pp.9-10). History (pp.14-20, author's interpretation, no citations): Tesla's 1900 oscillation transformer as a unipolar phase transformer; Marconi's Flat Top turned it into an ineffective capacity structure; Alexanderson's 1919 sectionalised loaded aerial (GE and US Navy) restored directivity and bandwidth; Dollard proposes dividing the ground part into independent vertical earth elements with an overhead counterpoise. General theory (pp.20-22): any wave is a superposition of magnetic and dielectric induction; a TEM wave has fields perpendicular to each other and to the axis with ratio c; a complementary 'longitudinal magneto-dielectric' (L.M.D.) wave has fields collinear with propagation, ratio not equal to c, and dimension 'per unit length per unit time' (the 'counter-velocity'); the telluric wave is complex, real part TEM and imaginary part L.M.D. Harmonics: TEM Fo, 3Fo, 5Fo with amplitudes Ao, Ao/3, Ao/5; L.M.D. Fo, Fo/3, Fo/5 ('degressive') with the same amplitudes; asserted, not derived. Seismic claim: waves in the advance interval before a quake have a 'specific, distinct waveform' (p.12), with no evidence. Part Two (pp.23-30) is numbered claim-style repetition with no new quantities; numbering slips and a contents/body mismatch. Key claims
Relevance: Sole source for claim 5. Turns the dielectric/longitudinal ideas into an engineering design and one testable prediction (precursor detection), but supplies no data or numbers. Mainstream conflict: Strong for the wave theory: a source-free longitudinal plane E/B wave conflicts with div E = 0 and div B = 0, and a 'velocity' of dimension per length per time is not a speed [memory: high; reviewers to confirm]. Sub-harmonics at Fo/3 need nonlinearity or parametric pumping [memory: high]. Ground-contact antennas, filters and ULF/ELF earthquake-precursor research are mainstream topics; the claimed non-EM structure and reciprocity violation are not. Historical readings of Tesla, Marconi and Alexanderson contradict standard history that treats them as EM radiators [memory: medium]. | digest + deep read (pp.1-30, full OCR text read by Sonnet; page 11 footnote checked as page image). Note: the earlier Step 1 entry said 'text layer sampled', which is superseded. | partial |
| other | n/a | No browser-junk or skipped files n/a SummaryThe manifest holds 4 documents: the two scans of the compilation (OCR'd), EPDPaper (text layer), and the standalone Dielectricity article (text layer). No documents were skipped. Dollard's longer books (Theory of Wireless Power, Symbolic Representation of the Generalized Electric Wave, Condensed Intro to Tesla Transformers) are cited but not in the folder. Relevance: Coverage record. Mainstream conflict: none | filename only (nothing skipped: Step 0 manifest lists 4 PDFs, all text-extracted) | yes |