RankingsPrimerArbiterPhysicistMathematicianContrarianQESites logClaimsSourcesResearch notes

2026-10-04 Internet Archive Wayback Machine (author's 2002-2006 website)

Method: Wayback CDX index queries by script (no browser needed). - home.wanadoo.nl/kovavla*, home.wanadoo.nl/koenvanvlaenderen*, members.chello.nl/k.vlaenderen*: no captures (guessed URLs). - home.wanadoo.nl/raccoon* (the URL given in Bruhn's TU Darmstadt reference [1]): captures from 2002-10-02 to 2013 [web] http://web.archive.org/cdx/search/cdx?url=home.wanadoo.nl/raccoon*

Downloaded into research/files/ (Wayback raw "id_" copies): | File | Capture | What it is | |---|---|---| | wayback-raccoon-electrodynamics_secrets_IE2.html | 2002-12-12 | Author's page "The revealed secrets of classical electrodynamics", "Koen van Vlaenderen, Electrical engineer MD, The Hague" | | wayback-raccoon-scalarfield2.pdf | 2003-10-09 | K.J. van Vlaenderen and A. Waser, "Electrodynamics with the scalar field", dated October 17, 2001, 3 pp. (biquaternion form) | | wayback-raccoon-ELECTRODYNAMICS2.doc | 2003-05-25 | Word file "Generalisation of classical electrodynamics to admit a scalar field and longitudinal waves", by Koen van Vlaenderen alone, template "Conf_Proceedings.dot", created 24 Jan 2002 | | wayback-raccoon-LWscalarHeitler.pdf | 2003-05-25 | K.J. van Vlaenderen, "The Liénard-Wiechert potentials satisfy the Lorenz gauge condition", October 4, 2001 | | wayback-raccoon-LW_Lorenz_Maxwell.pdf | 2003-04-24 | Same title extended, "...and the Maxwell equations", Institute for Basic Research, March 1, 2003, 5 pp. | | wayback-raccoon-LWscalarLandau.pdf | 2003-05-26 | 1-page check of the Lorenz condition for Liénard-Wiechert potentials (Landau notation) | | wayback-raccoon-Art-p16.pdf | 2003-05-25 | G.F. Ignatiev (Krasnoyarsk University) and V.A. Leus (Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk), "On a superluminal transmission at the phase velocities", 2 pp. (posted on the author's site) | | wayback-raccoon-refutation-Bruhn-Remark.html | 2006-04-23 | Author's reply "Gerhard Bruhn's 'Remark' on my scalar field theory is wrong", with comments in red interleaved in Bruhn's text |

Not downloaded: W_Heitler.pdf (appears to be an excerpt from W. Heitler's textbook, not the author's work), image files.

Content noted [read]

  • scalarfield2.pdf abstract: "A single point charge cannot be a source for the scalar field, because the scalar field that is derived from the Liénard-Wiechert potentials is zero." It also says a Fourier analysis of retarded potentials shows the scalar field can arise otherwise (text cut at p.1). This is the author's own early statement of where S can and cannot come from. It bears on the deep reader's point that S is source-free when charge is conserved.
  • ELECTRODYNAMICS2.doc lists among the consequences "superluminal wave solutions, and possibly a classical theory about photon tunneling" and "a charge density wave that only induces a scalar field" (also in the 2001 Hadronic abstract).
  • Author's site, 2002: "The internet provides much information about Tesla's energy technology (in general) and overunity devices (in particular) that have been kept a secret... Officially, the longitudinal electric Tesla waves, electrostatic energy flow and electrodynamical overunity devices, are non-existant." He describes the Waser collaboration as defining "electro-static energy flow" and "an extra longitudinal Lorentz force component" [read: wayback-raccoon-electrodynamics_secrets_IE2.html]. This is the motivation behind claims 2 and 5.
  • Reply to Bruhn: "S is introduced not for mathematical reasons. S is introduced for describing new effects that are not covered by the usual Maxwell theory... Gerhard's conclusion that scalar field S is unnecessary in order to describe electromagnetic effects is correct." The S-field is said to describe "ElectroScalar effects, and NOT ElectroMagnetic effects" [read: wayback-raccoon-refutation-Bruhn-Remark.html].
  • Ignatiev-Leus paper [read: text layer]: wavelength 2.5 km; phase difference measured between the radiated signal and a calibrated optical-fibre reference at two distances, within the 0.5 km length of the cable; "The experiment was also varied topographically (different terrain) and seasonally (different soil humidity, snow cover). All of the measured values of phase difference were found to be such as if the signal velocity was c_e = 1.12c". The transmitter model is in-phase radial oscillators on a sphere (vertices of a dodecahedron), for which the magnetic fields along the axes sum to zero.

Bearing

Priority 1 (author's own early work and his reply to critics) and priority 2 (the primary text of the Ignatiev-Leus experiment, which the author reinterprets). The Ignatiev-Leus paper is short; its full Nova Science book chapter (1999) was not found.