Rankings Primer Arbiter Physicist Mathematician Contrarian QE Sites log Claims Sources Research notes

overunity.com (via Wayback Machine) - 2026-10-04

The live domain https://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/ now redirects to a GoDaddy "domain for sale" page [web]. The forum's content survives in the Wayback Machine and in the paid mirror overunityarchives.com (blocked: "Open for Paid Subscribed Members Only"; database error on the page tried).

1. "Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy" (topic 15395), snapshot 27 Jan 2017

https://web.archive.org/web/20170127213554/http://overunity.com/15395/partnered-output-coils-free-energy/ - Started by EMJunkie (Chris Sykes) 16 Jan 2015; "Pages: [1] ... 514"; "Read 1141189 times" at the snapshot date. overunityarchives search results show the thread reached at least page 1772 (posts dated March 2021). - Opening post links the Guidelines PDF and four videos: iJsVSMQqCOM, ZhQgch4L5XY, zSadMqEnO7I, Z-V1z2TdQJA; "required study" lcGWO_x8tpM and U9m86joRSMg. Earlier material "from about page 76" of the overunity.com thread "Magnet Myths and Misconceptions" (topic 14974). - Reply #1 (Sykes): first device video made "Between 4/5 years ago" (so about 2010-11), published about 4 years before Jan 2015; second video made about 2 years earlier, published ~Oct 2014. - Reply #4 (Sykes): "Lenz's Law is ONLY apparent when Current is drawn from the resulting Charge Separation ... So Energy is not Generated at all! It was already there!" (claim 2). - Reply #7 (Sykes): "Energy can not be created or destroyed. You and I agree with Science on this one!" - Reply #8 (MileHigh, a skeptic) refers to "your alleged COP 1.7 device" and asks: "Where is your own data? More pictures, measurements, dimensions, scope shots, test methodology, test setup, meter readings, power in and power out measurements? ... I looked through your pdf doc and I didn't see anything like that." Gives a 10-point measurement protocol (both test points, measured load resistance, error tolerances). Names TK, Itsu, MarkE, Picowatt as capable replicators. The COP 1.7 figure is attributed to Sykes by MileHigh; Sykes's own statement of it was not found on this run (earlier thread, probably topic 14974). - Reply #11 (Sykes): "Most everyone here can do it for no more than $20.00"; "Loose Coupling is a requirement!"; "I am asking for No Money!" - Reply #12: "To-date, I have found 3 configurations to work!" - Reply #10: wistiti points to Energetic Forum thread "bucking coil inverter" (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/19931-bucking-coil-inverter.html - not visited).

2. "Partnered Output Coils - Builders Group - Moderated!" (topic 18464), snapshot 5 Dec 2021

https://web.archive.org/web/20211205194515/https://overunity.com/18464/partnered-output-coils-builders-group-moderated/ - Opened by Sykes 24 Apr 2020; moderators Sykes and Chet (ramset). Recipe: input 25 turns 1.2 mm at 10% duty from ~3 V; secondary and tertiary 70-200 turns 0.8 mm, opposing; "Your Coils must be Loaded at all times"; "Benchmark ... in Transformer mode, making sure you have around 80% Efficiency at least. Then anything above the 80% mark you can verify, has entered the System". Coins "Delayed Conduction". Lists 11 explanatory videos (VUemDvugl4I ... CRduG2PNIgk). - Cites as related/supporting: Don Smith, "The MEG Team" (Asymmetrical Regauging), Tinman (2015 quote: "It would seem that a bucking coil arrangement dose indeed add energy to a system. My test over the years have shown this to be true, but all my devices ... are mechanical"), Graham Gunderson, CaptainLoz video #9. - Itsu replication on overunityresearch.com (topic 3951): Sykes (29 Sep 2020): "WHY IS ITSU MISSING THE MOST IMPORTANT BITS OF INFORMATION??? ... He has failed!" listing the replicator's load (6 V 0.6 W), unknown coil length, wrong waveform, "less than a basic Transformer Efficiency", 1 ohm/10 ohm shunts. This shows a careful third-party replication attempt existed and did not show the effect; its data are on overunityresearch.com (login wall). - Partzman (quoted, from OUR topic 3951): argues Sykes's posted schematic has the diodes reversed relative to his own scope pictures (L2/L3 conduct on L1's collapse), that L1's stored energy must be returned to the supply via a full or 3/4 bridge, and asks replicators to check whether the Rigol math is average or RMS. Sykes: "My Diagram is correct, change it, it wont work! Period!" and "the Input Power sent back to your Power Supply, can be greater than the Input Power Sent to the Coil! Input can become Negative!" - verpies asks for definitions ("Magnetic Resonance", which coils are partnered); Sykes: "Gold Coils are L2 and L3 ... Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic meaning di, in L2 and L3 over Time dt, are equal and Opposite." - stivep (Wesley) repeatedly asks where the energy comes from; Sykes: "My Work is shared under Public Domain ... Can not be Patented!"

Bearing on the claims

Claim 4 (input falls, output with no extra input): the 2020 statement that input power can go negative, and the benchmarking-against-80% method, are the inventor's later form of the claim.
Supporting/contrary evidence by others: a skeptic's protocol (MileHigh), a replication by Itsu reported as not showing the effect (data behind login), and a technical critique of the schematic (Partzman). These are the closest things to independent tests found on this run.