2026-10-04 J-STAGE (jstage.jst.go.jp): Physical Society of Japan meeting abstracts by Seike
DOIs came from CiNii (see the cinii note). The landing page was read in Chrome ("会議録・要旨集 フリー" = proceedings/abstracts, free access). The PDFs were downloaded with curl from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/{path}/_pdf/-char/ja. The text layer is unusable (OCR of handwritten/typeset Japanese), so pages were rendered at 110 dpi and read as images. Tag: [web: page image].
Files in files/:
- Seike-1982-JPS-NER-nuclear-electric-resonance.pdf: 31a-NG-6 「核電気共鳴」, JPS spring meeting 1982, p.5. DOI 10.11316/jpsgaiyoe.1982.1.0_5_2
- Seike-1984-JPS-gravity-cancellation-experiment.pdf: 1p-EB-11 「重力の消滅実験」, JPS autumn meeting 1984, p.38. DOI 10.11316/jpsgaiyok.1984.1.0_38_2
- Seike-1966-JPS-self-excited-NMR-negative-energy-I.pdf: 「負のエネルギーの自励NMR〔I〕」, JPS annual meeting 21(5), 1966, p.348 (affiliation: 東大理学部, University of Tokyo, Faculty of Science). DOI 10.11316/jpsgaiyoi.21.5.0_348. Not yet read as an image.
- Seike-1966-JPS-self-excited-NMR-negative-energy-II.pdf: 「負のエネルギーの自励NMR[第2報]」, JPS autumn meeting 1966, p.143. DOI 10.11316/jpsgaiyok.1966.1.0_143_2. Not yet read as an image.
1982, "Nuclear Electric Resonance" (核電気共鳴), Seike, Director, Gravity Research Institute [web: page image p.5]
This is the primary source for the book's p.82-83 "NER", "Kramer-equation" and "polar and axial spin". - "Nuclear Electric Resonance (NER) is the physical phenomenon dual (対, paired) to NMR". Its behaviour is found by solving the Frenkel-Kramers equations (フレンケル・クラマス方程式): - dϰ/dτ = α (ϰ × H − ι × E) - dι/dτ = α (ϰ × E − ι × H) - ϰ and ι are the axial angular momentum and the polar angular momentum (軸性角運動量及び極性角運動量), written with Dirac spinor components, e.g. ϰ₁ = yp³ − zp² + (iħ/2) γ²γ³ and iι₁ = x⁴p¹ − xp⁴ + (iħ/2) γ⁴γ¹, with x⁴ = ict. α = e/mc is the gyromagnetic constant; because it also couples the electric field (through ι), Seike calls it the "electromagnetic interaction constant". τ is proper time. - Field: a circularly polarised electromagnetic field H = (H₁ cos Ωτ, H₁ sin Ωτ, H₀), E = (−E₁ sin Ωτ, E₁ cos Ωτ, 0). The solution (diagram) has ϰ tracing a sharp cone and ι a flat cone, precessing about the combined field H + iE. With H = 0 and only a static E field, they still precess about it. He says this "can remove Frenkel's paradox" and that he will present more, including on semiconductor coils, at the meeting. - Bearing: the book's "Kramer-equation" (p.82) is evidently the Frenkel-Kramers spin equations. The book's "polar spin ... directly related to the gravitational field" is Seike's ι (polar angular momentum), and "a rotating electrical AC field superimposed on a DC magnetic field" (p.82-83) matches the rotating E₁ field plus the static H₀. This 1982 abstract does not mention gravity, negative gravitational energy, a power figure or the 3×10⁹ kW (those must be in his books, e.g. 『逆重力機関の組立方』 1982). For the reviewers: the Frenkel (1926) / Kramers spin equations are a real topic in relativistic spin theory, the ancestor of the BMT (Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi) equation [memory, medium].
1984, "Gravity cancellation experiment" (重力の消滅実験), Seike, Director, Gravity Research Institute [web: page image p.38]
An experimental claim with numbers (priority 1/2 for the book's Seiki material): - A coil is wound as a Möbius strip, "Möbius winding" (メビウス巻), and formed into a torus that becomes a Klein bottle (Figs. 1-2). "When current is passed, the Klein bottle becomes lighter." Passing 2-6 A DC through a 17-turn right-pitch Klein bottle with left Möbius winding gave these weight changes:
| Current (A) | Weight change (g) |
|---|---|
| 2 | −0.059 |
| 3 | −0.123 |
| 4 | −0.169 |
| 5 | −0.213 |
| 6 | −0.291 |
- "The coil weighs about 30 grams, so at about 620 amperes the weight becomes 0; this can be achieved at helium temperature" (i.e. with a superconducting coil).
- Explanation offered: tachyons; "since tachyons are faster than light, they catch up with old light and time reverses"; dividing a Möbius strip produces tachyons ("details at the meeting").
- The abstract does not state the balance used, the measurement uncertainty, the coil temperature rise, its orientation to the Earth's field, current-lead forces or controls (reversed current, non-Möbius coil). These are what a reviewer would need, and they are absent from the abstract, not shown to be absent from the experiment.
- Quick check of the abstract's own numbers: the change is roughly linear at about −0.05 g/A (the fit is the reviewer's job). 30 g / 0.05 g/A ≈ 600 A, consistent with his ≈620 A.