2026-10-08 ultrabeige.de: Max Stadler, Assembling Life (PhD thesis, Imperial College, 2009/2010)
Found through Google (same query as the Nature review). PDF saved: research/pages/stadler-2010.pdf (10 MB; evidence trail, not a research file for publication). URL [web]: https://www.ultrabeige.de/pdf/2010_assembling_life.pdf Max Stadler, "Assembling Life. Models, the cell, and the reformations of biological science, 1920-1960", PhD dissertation, Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, Imperial College London (dated London, October 2009). Six mentions of Lakhovsky.
Passages [web] (thesis pp. ~173-174)
- In the 1920s Schereschewsky (Office of Cancer Investigations, US Public Health Service) and Erwin Schliephake (Germany) investigated the therapeutic action of short electric waves "with small animals and 'inanimate models'". "More spectacularly, it were figures such as the exiled Russian engineer George Lakhovsky ... who revealed the 'new applications' of such short wave-length oscillations." His device "materialized, along with a new 'theory of life', as Radio News reported in 1925, as the Radio Cellulo-Oscillator", "producing currents up to 150 million cycles-per-second", reportedly with "a morbid action on plant cells, tumours and microbes".
- Stadler then contrasts this with diathermy and "radio fever" (artificial fever), which found far wider use.
- Bibliography entries: Lakhovsky, G., "Curing Cancer With Ultra Radio Frequencies", Radio News Magazine, February 1925; Lakhovsky, The Secret of Life (first published 1925; London 1939); de Kruif, P., "Life as a Matter of Voltage", New York Times, 22 August 1926.
Bearing (no verdicts)
- Priority 1: an English-language article by Lakhovsky himself, Radio News, Feb 1925 (Hugo Gernsback's magazine, with scans on worldradiohistory.com [memory, high confidence; not checked this run]), describing the Radio-cellulo-oscillator. Not yet obtained.
- Priority 4: a professional historian of biology places Lakhovsky within 1920s cell-model and radio-biology research, next to Schereschewsky and Schliephake. Paul de Kruif's 1926 New York Times piece is a lead on contemporary US press coverage.