RankingsPrimerArbiterPhysicistMathematicianContrarianQESites logClaimsSourcesResearch notes

2026-10-04 Rex Research (rexresearch.com)

Query: Google "Gunderson" "Magnetic Power Inc" OR magneticpowerinc.com GENIE OR "Power Chip" OR "Magnetic Power Module". Page read: http://www.rexresearch.com/gunderson/gunderson.htm (redirects to .html). Result: positive (compilation; secondary).

Findings

  • The compilation links grahamgunderson.com/ou, both patents (full text), the archived magneticpowerinc.com patent application, an overunity.com discussion, "electropub.wordpress.com -- Spiral Transformer – related to Graham's patent", energyscienceconference.com photos and interview, and energeticforum threads [web].
  • Forum excerpt on the 2015 transformer: "using phase to rotate flux along the gap under resonance ... virtual rotation", "only COP 1.03" [web].
  • It reproduces "Physics Review Board -- Chava Energy's ZPE GENERATOR Fraud". That is a critic's characterization by an anonymous body whose standing is unknown. It quotes Chava Energy's (since removed) website:
  • "Chava has two U.S. Patents ... under the trademark of MagGen™. Patents #7,830,065 and #8,093,869 cover solid-state (no moving parts) magnetic generators. An early prototype produced an output, at a very low power level, of more than 100 times the input."
  • "MagGen™ ... alternate routes to tapping the energy of quantum noise (Zero Point Energy) via the magnetic spin moment."
  • "Several prototypes of more advanced devices have been built and an additional, very broad, patent application has also been filed ... We expect to file an additional thirty (30) patents over the next three (3) years".
  • "Chava expects, within three years, of creating prototype ... conversion systems to provide power for automobiles."
  • The critic says Chava used these claims for "five years" to solicit "investments and grants", calls them "fraudcraft", and labels the devices "Gunderson-20060163971" and "Gunderson-8093869" [web].
  • Two interested parties stand on opposite sides here: the assignee (Chava, commercial stake, claiming more than 100x output) and an anonymous critic (calling it fraud). Neither statement comes from Gunderson. No prototype data from either side was found.

Bearing on the claims

  • Claims 1-6: this is the assignee's characterization of the patents as zero-point-energy devices with a prototype giving more than 100x output. The patents themselves contain no such data [read: facts.json].
  • The record does not show what became of the "very broad" additional application or the 30 expected patents. Google Patents shows no further Gunderson or Chava families (see the google-patents notes). Treat this as an absence-of-evidence anomaly.