2026-10-05 arXiv (helium background in LENR experiments)

Site: https://arxiv.org . Bears on Claim 2 (He-4 as evidence; the air-helium weakness Miles 1996 admits).

Searched

Google: ARPA-E LENR program 2023 awards low-energy nuclear reactions helium (returned the paper below); arXiv title search "Helium Detection in Technical Materials"; abstract page.

Found

A. K. Gillespie, C. Lin, D. Jones, R. V. Duncan (Texas Tech University), "Helium Detection in Technical Materials", arXiv:2405.02307 [physics.ins-det], submitted 25 Mar 2024 [web: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02307]. Abstract (read): materials used in fusion studies "can retain atmospheric helium unless pretreated"; "The presence of helium is often cited as the primary evidence that a nuclear reaction has occurred, so it is imperative that known sources of helium are mitigated"; they measure leak rates and helium retention; "Without pretreatment, stainless-steel 316 retains between 15-240 pmol of 4He", i.e. 0.07-1.20 pmol/cm^2, and "may reabsorb 4He from the atmosphere in time". The Google snippet ties the work to ARPA-E LENR funding ("This funding aims to establish clear protocols ... ARPA-E LENR"); the funding link was not confirmed on the abstract page.

Worked number (for the reader)

1 pmol = 1e-12 mol x 6.022e23 /mol = 6.0e11 atoms. So 15-240 pmol = 9.0e12 to 1.45e14 atoms. At 2.6e11 He-4 atoms per joule (d + d -> 4He, 23.8 MeV each), that much helium would correspond to about 35 to 560 J of "nuclear" heat [calculation, this run; Python check]. A cell with 0.5 W excess for one day releases about 43,000 J, i.e. about 1.1e16 He atoms (about 19 nmol), so the stainless-steel background is 0.1% to 1.3% of the expected signal for a day-long run at 0.5 W, but comparable to the signal for a short or low-power run.

How it bears: an independent (non-LENR-society) instrumentation group, working on the ARPA-E-era protocols, quantifies exactly the systematic error the arbiter flags (air helium). It does not report a heat-helium measurement itself.